Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Considering the branching of the thread into subjective evaluation of
imaging, I changed the subject. I have always found the chesky sampler and test cd, the first as I recall, to be very helpful. It has one computer created track where a signal starts in the left speaker, rises vertically to near ceiling level , then shifts 90 degrees until over the right speaker and then descends into it. I have found the best results imaging wise are provided with room adjustment and speaker placement and listening position adjustment using it. This happens when it simulates the signal reproduction as near perfect a flight path as it is recorded to be. A lopsided right or left leg often means that some source of reflection or other acoustic source is different on that side relative to the other side. This might happen for example when one speaker is much closer to a side wall. The horizontal signal likewise including how high it goes often says something about vertical sources. Best overall results for me are with absorbing and randomizing side walls and rear wall. This means in practical terms filled book cases with a mixture of book and other objects. I use dippoles so this makes sense. On minimally miced recordings the image is stable and smooth and not lop sided and has depth if this is the case. Likewise white and pink noise are smooth across the plane of the speakers. This makes sense because any abberations of signals the environment provides are minimal when the test is at its best. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... Considering the branching of the thread into subjective evaluation of imaging, I changed the subject. I have always found the chesky sampler and test cd, the first as I recall, to be very helpful. It has one computer created track where a signal starts in the left speaker, rises vertically to near ceiling level , then shifts 90 degrees until over the right speaker and then descends into it. I have found the best results imaging wise are provided with room adjustment and speaker placement and listening position adjustment using it. This happens when it simulates the signal reproduction as near perfect a flight path as it is recorded to be. A lopsided right or left leg often means that some source of reflection or other acoustic source is different on that side relative to the other side. This might happen for example when one speaker is much closer to a side wall. The horizontal signal likewise including how high it goes often says something about vertical sources. Best overall results for me are with absorbing and randomizing side walls and rear wall. This means in practical terms filled book cases with a mixture of book and other objects. I use dippoles so this makes sense. On minimally miced recordings the image is stable and smooth and not lop sided and has depth if this is the case. Likewise white and pink noise are smooth across the plane of the speakers. This makes sense because any abberations of signals the environment provides are minimal when the test is at its best. Having once had a similar configuration of speakers and "absorbing and randomizing side walls and rear wall" via bookcases as my main listening room, I suspect this IS a very fine-sounding setup. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
comments on the sound of "Snow White" and "Wizard of Oz" | Pro Audio | |||
"AKAI", "KURZWEIL", "ROLAND", DVDs and CDs | Audio Opinions |