Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 May 2010 07:46:57 -0700, Ed Seedhouse wrote
(in article ): On May 29, 6:57=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote: That's because it's different for each listener. All of us should have a clear idea of what real music means to us. I don't even have a clear idea of "what real music means to us" means. It seems to me to be a phrase that is simply lacking in content, and thus meaningless. Well, of course, I can't help that. If you don't have any feeling for the sound of real music, and can't recognize the difference between real and reproduced, then I'd have to say that you are at a distinct disadvantage wrt to being an audio enthusiast. OTOH, I CAN make that differentiation, and I can tell when a stereo system sounds close to real music and when one doesn't. Not only that, but I've the confidence in my judgement to believe that those judgements are generally spot-on. It is not my "job" to convince anyone else, but I do know what real music sounds like, I do know what a good stereo system sounds like and I am able to discern and often quantify the differences between the two. We also know when a system is approaching OUR IDEA of what real music should sound like. There are so m= any aspects to the recreation of that real event that no system, no matter ho= w elaborate or sophisticated, can ever hope to approach. So, each person se= izes upon those portions of that real event that they consider important to th= em. With some, it might be imaging and soundstage, others might fixate on get= ting the midrange "right", still others might obsess over getting the bass to sound real by moving as much air in their listening room as possible, som= e might require high frequencies that are neither dry or overly bright, but sound clean and extended and as much like their memory of the highs in = =A0their favorite concert hall as is possible. I think "obsess" is the operative word here. I personally am not "obsessed" with any of these things. I would prefer as much accuracy as I am able to afford considering all the other things beside music that also enrich my life, and need money to obtain. By what criteria do you gauge "accuracy?" How do YOU know that a system is "accurate" or not? And accurate to what? To me it's accuracy to the sound of live, acoustic (unamplified) music played in a real space. If I happened to win a lottery I would probably look for better. But fortunately a lot of accuracy is available for not all that much money. I certainly do not disagree with that. Realizing that no single playback system can give them the literal recrea= tion of the event in their listening environment, each =A0works on getting tho= se aspects of the playback right that say "live music" TO THEM. That is their business and more power to them, although I think any kind of obsession is best avoided if we would like to stay healthy. It's not an obsession (at least not to me) I buy based on the sound of real music and then I don't think about it very much. For instance, I just got a new phono cartridge from Soundsmith. It's a development of the old B&O "Stereodyne" line of cartridges. It's moving iron (variable reluctance) using a push-pull generating technique and it's the most realistic sounding cartridge that I think I've ever heard. Due to its design it has far less distortion than other designs and it makes a real, audible improvement to the sound of records. When I first got it, I pulled record after record out of my collection and listened to the wee hours, but now it's just my phono cartridge. I appreciate the advance in sound quality that I get from it, but I certainly don't dote on it any more than I do the rest of my system. It's just part of the synergy of a well thought-out and executed system honed to sound the most real when playing back my own master recordings - often played back just hours after they were recorded - you can't get much "fresher" of a comparison than that!. My system approaches real music to the degree that when I listen, I hear no glaring omissions nor do I hear any anomalies that make me say to myself "Hey, this didn't sound like that when I recorded it." In fact, my reaction is just the opposite. I'm constantly gratified by just how much my recordings and my system's playback of them sound like the live performance sounded when I was recording it! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Live Music Theater looking to build serious Live Recording Studio | Pro Audio | |||
Reference monitors for Dance music | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Music Reference RM-10 triode Tube Amp | Marketplace | |||
Can the DEA kill live music? They're trying..... | Pro Audio |