Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the time being, I'm recording with PT LE. The players need to be
able to monitor effectively in a couple of ISO booths. To overcome latency for the players, my workaround is to patch mics into channels on a Mackie board before the preamps -- Then I send from the channel direct outs into a firewire or a lightpipe preamp. I use the effects sends to route signal to personal submixers for the players. This workaroun is not so great - the power supply has a proprietary cable and a fan -- so the door to my quiet room has to stay ajar for the power supply! So I either have to a) jump up to PT HD - which is rather more $$ than I have at the moment - or b) get into some preamps with close to zero-latency monitor outputs. - or c) swap out the Mackie board for something with channel direct outs - but without a fan. - or d) some monitoring scenario I haven't considered... Suggestions? TIA. Louis |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 1 May 2010 03:44:43 -0400, L. Durra wrote
(in article ): For the time being, I'm recording with PT LE. The players need to be able to monitor effectively in a couple of ISO booths. To overcome latency for the players, my workaround is to patch mics into channels on a Mackie board before the preamps -- Then I send from the channel direct outs into a firewire or a lightpipe preamp. I use the effects sends to route signal to personal submixers for the players. This workaroun is not so great - the power supply has a proprietary cable and a fan -- so the door to my quiet room has to stay ajar for the power supply! So I either have to a) jump up to PT HD - which is rather more $$ than I have at the moment - or b) get into some preamps with close to zero-latency monitor outputs. - or c) swap out the Mackie board for something with channel direct outs - but without a fan. - or d) some monitoring scenario I haven't considered... Suggestions? TIA. Louis Are you on PT USB hardware? If so, the PTLE FW stuff (DIGI 003) has negligible latency. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you tried going to the track menu and enabling "input only
monitoring" on the tracks in record? They don't get the personal submix, but that should give you the same result (monitoring the input) without the repatching hassle. v |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
L. Durra wrote:
For the time being, I'm recording with PT LE. The players need to be able to monitor effectively in a couple of ISO booths. To overcome latency for the players, my workaround is to patch mics into channels on a Mackie board before the preamps -- Then I send from the channel direct outs into a firewire or a lightpipe preamp. I use the effects sends to route signal to personal submixers for the players. This workaroun is not so great - the power supply has a proprietary cable and a fan -- so the door to my quiet room has to stay ajar for the power supply! So I either have to a) jump up to PT HD - which is rather more $$ than I have at the moment - or b) get into some preamps with close to zero-latency monitor outputs. - or c) swap out the Mackie board for something with channel direct outs - but without a fan. - or d) some monitoring scenario I haven't considered... Suggestions? TIA. Louis All that info and you don't mention what PT LE hardware you're using. Would be helpful to know. -- Eric Practice Your Mixing Skills Download Our Multi-Track Masters www.Raw-Tracks.com www.Mad-Host.com |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 May 2010 00:33:32 -0400, Raw-Tracks wrote
(in article ): L. Durra wrote: For the time being, I'm recording with PT LE. The players need to be able to monitor effectively in a couple of ISO booths. To overcome latency for the players, my workaround is to patch mics into channels on a Mackie board before the preamps -- Then I send from the channel direct outs into a firewire or a lightpipe preamp. I use the effects sends to route signal to personal submixers for the players. This workaroun is not so great - the power supply has a proprietary cable and a fan -- so the door to my quiet room has to stay ajar for the power supply! So I either have to a) jump up to PT HD - which is rather more $$ than I have at the moment - or b) get into some preamps with close to zero-latency monitor outputs. - or c) swap out the Mackie board for something with channel direct outs - but without a fan. - or d) some monitoring scenario I haven't considered... Suggestions? TIA. Louis All that info and you don't mention what PT LE hardware you're using. Would be helpful to know. What latency? There is no appreciable latency in a PTLE FW system. Are you using USB? Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty Ford wrote:
What latency? There is no appreciable latency in a PTLE FW system. Are you using USB? There certainly can be appreciable latency in an LE FW system. If the buffers are not set low enough, there will be latency. -- Eric Practice Your Mixing Skills Download Our Multi-Track Masters www.Raw-Tracks.com www.Mad-Host.com |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raw-Tracks wrote:
Ty Ford wrote: What latency? There is no appreciable latency in a PTLE FW system. There certainly can be appreciable latency in an LE FW system. If the buffers are not set low enough, there will be latency. The "musical" latency of the input is usually low enough so that you can play pretty much in time if you have to monitor what's coming out of the D/A converter instead listening to the input, but there's always some delay. When listening to your own voice on headphones through the input/output chain, you can usually hear the effect of comb filtering due to the acoustic and electric sources combining at your eardrum. The usual fix (or it's already the case so it's never noticed) is to turn up the headphone volume so that it swamps out what you hear through your normal throat-to-ear connection. That's often too loud for some singers who aren't belters, but good for belters. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 May 2010 23:27:39 -0400, Raw-Tracks wrote
(in article ): Ty Ford wrote: What latency? There is no appreciable latency in a PTLE FW system. Are you using USB? There certainly can be appreciable latency in an LE FW system. If the buffers are not set low enough, there will be latency. Long answer: If I lick a light socket, I can expect a shock if the socket is hot. Any piece of gear not operated properly can be expected not to work properly. Short answer: Yah think? Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mp3 monitoring | Pro Audio | |||
legit scenarios for using compression during tracking? | Pro Audio | |||
in-ears for monitoring? | Pro Audio | |||
How bad is my monitoring ? | Pro Audio | |||
LS3/5A for monitoring | Pro Audio |