Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 5:26*pm, wrote:
http://www.6moons.com/industryfeatur...urnagra/1.html Fascinating tour of Kudelski/Nagra from 2009. *Lots of photos of designers, testers, engineers at work on some high-end Nagra audio products. *On one of the later pages, there are very interesting pictures of the "Nagra Museum", featuring some of the venerable tape recorders. The photo tour was indeed a rare treat, having been the owner of a few Nagra III's, a 4L and a 4.2L during the start of my career. The sad part omitted was why a company that "owned" the business of recording sound on films, ignoring Stellavox as most people did, let it slip away by holding on to the reel to reel usage a little too long. My start with DAT was painful and I missed the Nagra, but it was clear to me even then that there would be no going back to an open reel device. Now I'm about 5 years into the hard disc drive world and feel the same about DAT recorders, but as sweet as that 6 track Nagra machine looked, I'd have to hesitate to re-fi my house to get one. Just guessing, but I think that they are likely to be what one could call "pricey". Cheers, Jerry www.boskolives.wordpress.com |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fuzznuts wrote:
The photo tour was indeed a rare treat, having been the owner of a few Nagra III's, a 4L and a 4.2L during the start of my career. The sad part omitted was why a company that "owned" the business of recording sound on films, ignoring Stellavox as most people did, let it slip away by holding on to the reel to reel usage a little too long. In part there was kind of a perception at the time that razor blade editing in the field would remain important. A lot of fancy stuff went into the Nagra D in order to make razor blading possible. Then the inexpensive DAW came along and everything changed. Don't forget Uher either, which still had a bit of the market. Even so, Nagra had pretty much all of the high end of the portable sound market. The thing is, Nagra is probably selling more machines today than it was back in 1970. They still _do_ have pretty much all of the high end of the market, it's just that the high end of the market is a lot smaller percentage of the total market than it used to be. My start with DAT was painful and I missed the Nagra, but it was clear to me even then that there would be no going back to an open reel device. Now I'm about 5 years into the hard disc drive world and feel the same about DAT recorders, but as sweet as that 6 track Nagra machine looked, I'd have to hesitate to re-fi my house to get one. Just guessing, but I think that they are likely to be what one could call "pricey". They are very expensive. You can certainly buy a BMW for what they cost. But then again, back in 1975 you could buy a BMW 2002 for about what the Nagra IV cost, so the relative price really hasn't changed much. What has changed is that the competition is just so damn cheap. That's a matter of large scale production bringing costs down. Along with that has come the expectation that everything is going to be cheap. We have become a nation of cheapskates. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nagra IV-S vs Nagra 4.2 sound quality | Pro Audio | |||
Fascinating tour of Kudelski/Nagra | Pro Audio | |||
Nagra IV-S vs Nagra 4.2 sound quality | Pro Audio | |||
For Immediate ebay sale: NAGRA KUDELSKI IV-S REEL TO REEL W/ TIME CODE RECORDER | Pro Audio | |||
For Immediate ebay sale: NAGRA KUDELSKI IV-S REEL TO REEL W/ TIME CODE RECORDER | Pro Audio |