[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 27, 11:31*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
MiNe 109 said:

*It's like [Witless is] starting over from
zero and hadn't seen any contrary evidence.

I'd ask if I can quote you, but in fact you're quoting me.

Sensorimotor Stage (Birth-2 Years)
Even though Piaget was opposed to applying age norms to the stages,
most researchers consider approximately the first two years of life to
be the Sensorimotor Stage (McCormick, 1997). Infants mainly make use
of senses and motor capabilities to experience the environment. For
instance, if infants cannot see or touch an object, they stop trying
to find it. Once infants develop the capability to recognize that a
hidden object still continues to exist, they start searching for it.

The characteristic limitation of this stage is ‘thinking only by
doing’. The Sensorimotor infant gains physical knowledge.

http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/piaget/index.htm

Piaget beat you to it.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

*It's like [Witless is] starting over from
zero and hadn't seen any contrary evidence.

I'd ask if I can quote you, but in fact you're quoting me.

[snip]

Piaget beat you to it.

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

woof!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 27, 6:20*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

*It's like [Witless is] starting over from
zero and hadn't seen any contrary evidence.
I'd ask if I can quote you, but in fact you're quoting me.

[snip]

Piaget beat you to it.

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

Was Pavlov a pioneer in the field of whining or something?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

*It's like [Witless is] starting over from
zero and hadn't seen any contrary evidence.
I'd ask if I can quote you, but in fact you're quoting me.

[snip]

Piaget beat you to it.

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

Was Pavlov a pioneer in the field of whining or something?

I believe his field was slobber control.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 27, 9:23*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

It's like [Witless is] starting over from
zero and hadn't seen any contrary evidence.
I'd ask if I can quote you, but in fact you're quoting me.

[snip]

Piaget beat you to it.

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

Was Pavlov a pioneer in the field of whining or something?

I believe his field was slobber control.

Thank God 2pid isn't peeing all over the rug again. This Pavlov
apparently couldn't help with 2pid's bladder control.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

Was Pavlov a pioneer in the field of whining or something?

I believe his field was slobber control.

Thank God 2pid isn't peeing all over the rug again. This Pavlov
apparently couldn't help with 2pid's bladder control.

Doesn't piddle-training of pooches involve newspapers? Maybe that's why
Witless is so afraid of them, rather than the "liberal bias" he's always
yapping about.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 28, 12:09*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

That's all very well, but if you're gonna go all scientific, I think you
absolutely must refer to Pavlov's work.

Was Pavlov a pioneer in the field of whining or something?

I believe his field was slobber control.

Thank God 2pid isn't peeing all over the rug again. This Pavlov
apparently couldn't help with 2pid's bladder control.

Doesn't piddle-training of pooches involve newspapers? Maybe that's why
Witless is so afraid of them, rather than the "liberal bias" he's always
yapping about.

He consistently gets his nose rubbed in his own **** here yet he keeps
coming back and pooping.

Perhaps 2pid simply isn't trainable.