[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 22, 11:17*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 22, 2:55*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:





Yapper woofed:

Did you really say Sen. John Kerry is or was a "traitor"? On what evidence
do you base that accusation?

His statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22,
1971.

[snip details of atrocities]

*Kerry is either a war criminal or a treasonous liar. *

This is where you and the rational world part company. It was a simple
question:

On what evidence do you base that accusation that Kerry is a traitor?

His own admitted false accusations undermining our troops in time of
war.
(See sssshhhh for definition of undermining).

But what cheney said was not. And Congress has a right to vote "no" on
something which cheney then called "undermining the troops" and
therefore accused them of 'treason' using the definition you use to
'prove' Kerry is a 'traitor'.

Hm. That looks pretty hypocritical.

(PS: I knew why you 'thought' Kerry was a 'traitor'. I just wanted to
see you deny the definition on the one hand and affirm it on the
other. LoL. Thanks for the chuckle.)