Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:28:40 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ): "Sonnova" wrote in message ... Yes, of course. Still converting the signal to digital on the sending end and back to analog on the receiving end is better yet, and I know it would be cheaper than this product. Note that the technique of converting the signal to digital for optical transmission is used for virtually all modern communications involving any type of signal (voice, music, video, data, telemetry) that is transmitted any significant distance, anywhere in the world. There are a number of legacy technology exceptions related to broadcasting to consumers. Somehow, generally accepted digital technology isn't good enough for a few audiophiles. Maybe not, but it's certainly GOT to be better than this EXPENSIVE analog optical transmission system tested by Stereophile. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
give us a chance is also give u a chance | Pro Audio | |||
Found by chance elsewhere | Pro Audio | |||
"Fly me to the moon" | Audio Opinions | |||
La chance de votre vie | Car Audio |