Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to know what your opinion is on the best signal chain for mixing film in terms of where should the compressors,EQ, expanders, and limiters should be. What are your experiences? and what's your process of mixing for film. I know that religiously using expanders/compressors, eq, and limiters are key, but in what order should they be in? I was thinking that individual dialogue tracks should look like compressor - expander - EQ in the signal processing chain. Then those individual tracks will get bussed over to a dialogue bus track, which would then have an expander. What do you think? -R |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:36:50 -0700 (PDT), Ryan
wrote: I just wanted to know what your opinion is on the best signal chain for mixing film in terms of where should the compressors,EQ, expanders, and limiters should be. What are your experiences? and what's your process of mixing for film. I know that religiously using expanders/compressors, eq, and limiters are key, but in what order should they be in? I was thinking that individual dialogue tracks should look like compressor - expander - EQ in the signal processing chain. Then those individual tracks will get bussed over to a dialogue bus track, which would then have an expander. What do you think? I think that, especially as it's Easter Sunday, it would be inappropriate to question your religious delusions. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ryan wrote:
I just wanted to know what your opinion is on the best signal chain for mixing film in terms of where should the compressors,EQ, expanders, and limiters should be. What are your experiences? and what's your process of mixing for film. What kind of film for what? Some of the best films out there were made without any processing at all, because of the way the original tracks were recorded. On the other hand, a lot of films today have hundreds of stems with very deeply layered effects, and it takes EQ and dynamics control in order to keep everything from stepping on everything else. I know that religiously using expanders/compressors, eq, and limiters are key, but in what order should they be in? I was thinking that individual dialogue tracks should look like compressor - expander - EQ in the signal processing chain. Then those individual tracks will get bussed over to a dialogue bus track, which would then have an expander. What do you think? I think you should do whatever it takes to make the dialogue sound good, and that may involve no processing at all and just some manual gainriding, or it may involve some compression. It might need a lot of EQ or no EQ at all depending on the skill of the recordist. Careful dynamic processing can allow you to keep the vocal level constant without having the noise floor pumping too much. In some kinds of mix you want to hide the noise floor of the dialogue track... in other kinds of mix the noise floor of the dialogue track adds much of the sense of space to the track. Listen to the track. Use processing to fix problems. If there are no problems, you need no processing. NOW, build everything else up around your dialogue track. Clearly this isn't possible for some scenes where there is no dialogue, but it's a good way to think about the whole film mix. --scott (2 dubbers, 4 dummies, interlock and ready to roll here) -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 9:29*am, "Soundhaspriority" wrote:
"Ryan" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I just wanted to know what your opinion is on the best signal chain for mixing film in terms of where should the compressors,EQ, expanders, and limiters should be. What are your experiences? and what's your process of mixing for film. I know that religiously using expanders/compressors, eq, and limiters are key, but in what order should they be in? I was thinking that individual dialogue tracks should look like compressor - expander - EQ in the signal processing chain. Then those individual tracks will get bussed over to a dialogue bus track, which would then have an expander. What do you think? It's not the key tool. The key tool is automation. First, get the dialog levels right by riding gain with your automation tool. Bob Morein (310) 237-6511 I certainly agree with Bobs recommendation for automation which is pretty simple. I would begin though with eqexpander/ compressionambience/room/plate reverbDAW. Just my two cents that will probably be tossed in the air and holed by some more experienced ME! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
signal chain Q | Pro Audio | |||
Capacitors in the signal chain | Pro Audio | |||
New Soundclip- Schoeps with different signal chain | Pro Audio | |||
signal chain check | Pro Audio | |||
signal chain ... | Pro Audio |