Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hope you won't mind another newbie question. You were very gracious
last time. I've been recording a lot of solo trombone and vocals, not for production but just to monitor student's progress. I've been using an old stereo condenser microphone, powered by an internal AA, directly into the microphone port of a laptop running Audacity, and getting usable results. In the past I've had fairly decent amateur recordings with that mike into a tape deck. Not to you guys's standards of course, but okay. But I figured with an external sound card I could do better not only at recording but at playback. So I bought an M-Audio Fasttrack Pro, and plugged the same mike into it. I don't get enough signal level to do usable recordings. In fact it doesn't record at all unless I turn the gain all the way to the stop. I expected an interface with preamps would give me more signal than the laptop's builtin port, but I get less. So what did I do wrong? Bad choice of interface? Maybe got a defective one? Something I'm missing? Or was the whole thing a dumb idea? It's the only mike I had handy, I was going to upgrade one piece of signal path at a time. I was also hoping to use this to put some LPs on to the computer, haven't tried that yet but suspect that'll be too low as well. Output is pretty good, I like the audio quality. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TimR" wrote ...
Hope you won't mind another newbie question. You were very gracious last time. I've been recording a lot of solo trombone and vocals, not for production but just to monitor student's progress. I've been using an old stereo condenser microphone, powered by an internal AA, directly into the microphone port of a laptop running Audacity, and getting usable results. In the past I've had fairly decent amateur recordings with that mike into a tape deck. Not to you guys's standards of course, but okay. But I figured with an external sound card I could do better not only at recording but at playback. So I bought an M-Audio Fasttrack Pro, and plugged the same mike into it. I don't get enough signal level to do usable recordings. In fact it doesn't record at all unless I turn the gain all the way to the stop. I expected an interface with preamps would give me more signal than the laptop's builtin port, but I get less. So what did I do wrong? Bad choice of interface? Maybe got a defective one? Something I'm missing? The main thing missing is the identity of your microphone? If we knew exactly what it is (make and model), we might be able to help determine if it is interfaced to the M-Audio box properly, and indeed, if it is even posible to make it work properly. Better to have too many details than too few. Can you tell us exactly what microphone you are using, and exactly how you have it plugged into the M-Audio box? (Including any kinds of adapters, if you are using any?) Unless the M-Audio box is broken (which doesn't seem very likely) there would appear to be no fundamental reason you shouldn't be able to do this. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 4:58*pm, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
"TimR" *wrote ... Hope you won't mind another newbie question. *You were very gracious last time. I've been recording a lot of solo trombone and vocals, not for production but just to monitor student's progress. I've been using an old stereo condenser microphone, powered by an internal AA, directly into the microphone port of a laptop running Audacity, and getting usable results. *In the past I've had fairly decent amateur recordings with that mike into a tape deck. *Not to you guys's standards of course, but okay. But I figured with an external sound card I could do better not only at recording but at playback. *So I bought an M-Audio Fasttrack Pro, and plugged the same mike into it. *I don't get enough signal level to do usable recordings. *In fact it doesn't record at all unless I turn the gain all the way to the stop. I expected an interface with preamps would give me more signal than the laptop's builtin port, but I get less. So what did I do wrong? *Bad choice of interface? *Maybe got a defective one? *Something I'm missing? The main thing missing is the identity of your microphone? If we knew exactly what it is (make and model), we might be able to help determine if it is interfaced to the M-Audio box properly, and indeed, if it is even posible to make it work properly. *Better to have too many details than too few. Can you tell us exactly what microphone you are using, and exactly how you have it plugged into the M-Audio box? (Including any kinds of adapters, if you are using any?) Unless the M-Audio box is broken (which doesn't seem very likely) there would appear to be no fundamental reason you shouldn't be able to do this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure but I'm embarassed to admit it. I dug an old Realistic condenser mike out of the drawer. I bought it sometime in the 70's. It has two 1/4 inch plugs on it. I recall it being fairly expensive at the time. To make it work with the laptop, I used a kludge job of two 1/4 inche to RCA connectors, then a (double RCA) to (stereo mini) Y connector. It was painful to look at but put the signal into the laptop fine. The M-Audio has two jacks on the front so I just pulled all the adapter junk off and put the two mike plugs directly in. If I really need to buy another microphone or two now (I don't actually need stereo for students but would for an audition recording) I can, but if there's something more fundamentally wrong then that may not be the right direction. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TimR" wrote ...
The M-Audio has two jacks on the front so I just pulled all the adapter junk off and put the two mike plugs directly in. The concentric 1/4-inch phone inputs on the M-Audio box are instrument inputs (vs. mic input). You may need to use adapters that allow connecting your mic to the 3-pin XLR part of the input connectors. I couldn't find the user manual or any info on M-Audio's website that gave much description of the instrument inputs vs. mic inputs on that box. I would have thought that you would find the opposite effect plugging an electret mic into an "instrument input" (levels too high), but absent any hard info, who knows? |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 5:49*pm, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
"TimR" *wrote ... The M-Audio has two jacks on the front so I just pulled all the adapter junk off and put the two mike plugs directly in. The concentric 1/4-inch phone inputs on the M-Audio box are instrument inputs (vs. mic input). You may need to use adapters that allow connecting your mic to the 3-pin XLR part of the input connectors. *I couldn't find the user manual or any info on M-Audio's website that gave much description of the instrument inputs vs. mic inputs on that box. I would have thought that you would find the opposite effect plugging an electret mic into an "instrument input" (levels too high), but absent any hard info, who knows? Per the owner's manual, I have a choice between line and instrument for those inputs. I had the button set for instrument; for line it inserts resistance to keep the levels low. I'll call the product support and see what they say. I assumed if you can plug a guitar in, it could handle a straight 1/4 plug, not a TRS. The 1/4 should just short out the ring and shaft, right? Any recommendation on a better microphone for my purposes, solo and small group instrumental recordings? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TimR wrote:
I dug an old Realistic condenser mike out of the drawer. I bought it sometime in the 70's. It has two 1/4 inch plugs on it. Well, there's your problem. You're probably plugging those 1/4" plugs into the 1/4" jacks on the M-Audio interface because they fit. Logical, wot? Well, those are line level inputs and have about 20 dB less gain than the mic inputs. What you need are some 1/4" to XLR adapters so you can connect your Radio Shack mic to the mic inputs on your interface. That will make it work like a microphone. There are several ways to make that sort of adapter. Some use a transformer to convert impedance as well as the physical connection, but I don't believe that's what you need. You need just hard-wired adapters, but there are a couple of ways that they could be wired. Your chances of getting the right one are pretty good, but there's a possibility that you could get one that's incorrectly wired for your mic or interface. The best thing is to make it yourself, but you're probably not up to that. If you were, you'd probably have done it already. Actually the simplest solution is to whack off the 1/4" phone plugs and replace them with XLRs wired with the hot lead to pin 2 and the shield wired to pins 1 and 3. A couple of these should get you set up properly: http://tinyurl.com/79jrrv -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TimR wrote:
Per the owner's manual, I have a choice between line and instrument for those inputs. I had the button set for instrument; for line it inserts resistance to keep the levels low. There's actually not a lot of difference between line and insturment level except that few instruments can put out +24 dBu. The difference is that the instrument input has a very high impedance so as to present the same sort of load to a pickup as an instrument amplifier would. It's a cheap trick to save you from having to buy a DI (direct) box. I'll call the product support and see what they say. Good luck with the phone, but I already gave you the right answer. I assumed if you can plug a guitar in, it could handle a straight 1/4 plug, not a TRS. The 1/4 should just short out the ring and shaft, right? Right, but plugging your mic into a guitar amplifier wouldn't work any better than plugging it into the instrument input on your M-Audio interface. You need to use the mic inputs to get sufficient gain, and you need to make the connectors match. Any recommendation on a better microphone for my purposes, solo and small group instrumental recordings? A Neumann U87 is always nice. Now, how much can you really afford? -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TimR wrote:
But I figured with an external sound card I could do better not only at recording but at playback. So I bought an M-Audio Fasttrack Pro, and plugged the same mike into it. I don't get enough signal level to do usable recordings. In fact it doesn't record at all unless I turn the gain all the way to the stop. Since you didn't say, let's do a quick sanity check: 1. Make sure you have the Inst/Line button set to Inst (instrument). 2. Make sure you have not engaged the -20dB pad. 3. There are separate controls on the FastTrack for preamp gain and output level. Make sure they are both turned up about midway (at least) to start. And you also need to check the settings in M-Audio's software mixer, to make sure you're recording off that interface (i.e., it's selected and not muted), and that the record level for the mic is turned up sufficiently there as well. Finally, there is probably a level slider for the channels in Audacity. Jay Ts -- To contact me, use this web page: http://www.jayts.com/contact.php |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 11:19*pm, Jay Ts wrote:
TimR wrote: But I figured with an external sound card I could do better not only at recording but at playback. *So I bought an M-Audio Fasttrack Pro, and plugged the same mike into it. *I don't get enough signal level to do usable recordings. *In fact it doesn't record at all unless I turn the gain all the way to the stop. Since you didn't say, let's do a quick sanity check: 1. Make sure you have the Inst/Line button set to Inst (instrument). 2. Make sure you have not engaged the -20dB pad. 3. There are separate controls on the FastTrack for preamp * *gain and output level. Make sure they are both turned up * *about midway (at least) to start. Yup, did that. Still some stuff in software to recheck. Actually this is encouraging, nobody has said the basic idea is dumb, you just think operator error is involved, probably so. Can I get a reasonable microphone for this type of home recording in the $100 to $200 range? or am I dreaming? When I dug that old mike out of the drawer I didn't actually expect it to work at all, I was pleasantly surprised. RS doesn't get any respect now, but back then some of their stuff was okay. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TimR wrote:
Can I get a reasonable microphone for this type of home recording in the $100 to $200 range? or am I dreaming? When I dug that old mike out of the drawer I didn't actually expect it to work at all, I was pleasantly surprised. RS doesn't get any respect now, but back then some of their stuff was okay. Search MCA SP-1 in the r.a.p. archives. -- ha shut up and play your guitar |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"hank alrich" wrote ...
TimR wrote: Can I get a reasonable microphone for this type of home recording in the $100 to $200 range? or am I dreaming? When I dug that old mike out of the drawer I didn't actually expect it to work at all, I was pleasantly surprised. RS doesn't get any respect now, but back then some of their stuff was okay. Search MCA SP-1 in the r.a.p. archives. This is the only place that I could find that still sells them.... http://www.pssl.com/MXL-SP1-Condense...hone-With-Clip A steal for $40 A more commercially availble alternative is AudioTechnica AT-2020 @ $80 |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Crowley wrote:
"hank alrich" wrote ... TimR wrote: Can I get a reasonable microphone for this type of home recording in the $100 to $200 range? or am I dreaming? When I dug that old mike out of the drawer I didn't actually expect it to work at all, I was pleasantly surprised. RS doesn't get any respect now, but back then some of their stuff was okay. Search MCA SP-1 in the r.a.p. archives. This is the only place that I could find that still sells them.... http://www.pssl.com/MXL-SP1-Condense...hone-With-Clip A steal for $40 I agree, and that's where I got my pair. A more commercially availble alternative is AudioTechnica AT-2020 @ $80 My only real reference there is Ty's commentary, and how real is that? g I don't recall if he commented directly comparatively. He has experienced both mics. -- ha shut up and play your guitar |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
M Audio Microtrack 2 input levels | Pro Audio | |||
Why Low Recording Levels - M-Audio 5.1 Card - Audio Technica Mic | Pro Audio | |||
Discrepancy in audio record levels in Cakewalk and Soundforge | Pro Audio | |||
Console Channel levels vs stereo bus levels? | Pro Audio | |||
consistent tv audio levels | Pro Audio |