Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question, can anyone here tell me what the difference is between the diffuse
and reverberant sound fields in an auditorium? Geoley |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Spearritt" wrote in message ... They refer to different things, really. A diffuse field is one where the sound pressure level is the same no matter where you are in the room, ie the sound is evenly distributed in the space, also the sound level does not drop with distance. A reverberant field occurs where all sound is reflected, there should be no or insignificant direct sound. Now there maybe an area in a concert hall where these two conditions are met, and for music it is difficult to create this scenario because the sound source is so transient. A diffuse field could be set up with speakers on the stage and some continuous white noise blaring forth, but music usually never lasts long enough to build up a steady diffuse field. If you did have speakers and some continuous broadband sound output, then start with a microphone at the speakers and move away until the point where the sound level does not fall with distance, then you have arrived at the reverberant field it is will probably be diffuse! Cheers David "Geoley" wrote in message ... Question, can anyone here tell me what the difference is between the diffuse and reverberant sound fields in an auditorium? Geoley Thanks David for the info. I'm contemplating buying a pair of schoeps omni mics and they offer four different omni capsules, MK-2 direct sound close in, MK-2H mid field, MK-2S designed for use at the edge of the reverberant field , MK-3 diffuse field . I have been advised that the MK-2S capsules would be a good choice for my use in recording pipe organ in a large church. Geoley |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoley wrote:
Thanks David for the info. I'm contemplating buying a pair of schoeps omni mics and they offer four different omni capsules, MK-2 direct sound close in, MK-2H mid field, MK-2S designed for use at the edge of the reverberant field , MK-3 diffuse field . I have been advised that the MK-2S capsules would be a good choice for my use in recording pipe organ in a large church. Get all of them on eval and send back the ones you don't like. A good dealer should be happy to let you do this. The top end response on all of these capsules are different. Far be it from me to suggest which one you'll like best. I'd suggest the MK-3, myself. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding microphones, most manufacturers now offer a "diffuse field"
capsule and a "free field" capsule for omni-directional microphones. The diffuse field capsule has a slight high frequency boost in the eq to compensate for an effective drop in frequency response when the mic is in the far, diffuse or reverb field. The free field capsules are generally flat in response and so may sound a bit dull in the reverb field. If you are doing lots of near field recording with omnis, ie fairly close miking, then the free field capsules will give the most tonally accurate sound, but if you are recording choirs, in cathedrals and are miking the room in the reverb field, then the diffuse field capsules are probably preferred. I purchased the diffuse field capsules for my KM130 omnis as I do lots of nearfield/reverbfield boundary positioning of omni pairs for classical music and choral music. Also a bit of HF boost when close can be equed out. Here are some links: http://www.neumann.com/infopool/mics...p?ProdID=km100 http://www.dpamicrophones.com/eng_pub/MicUni/55.html Cheers David |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imaging, soundstage, 3D | High End Audio | |||
the emperor's clothes | High End Audio | |||
Sound, Music, Balance | High End Audio | |||
DVI - The Destroyer Of Sound | High End Audio | |||
Surround Sound for Stereo Lovers | High End Audio |