Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think any new type radios from Lectro (as in diversity, agile,
scanning, with LCD displays and battery monitoring etc ) in the VHF band will be more expensive than the current UHF units for comparable performance (ie with a tracking front end as in 411a) since the R+D etc is being done with current dollars, not 2002 etc dollars, and the numbers they sell their portable units in are not very big (compared to rack units for PA use etc). I actually DO want new wirelesses to act like cel phone/ white space devices. I want them to find their own free freqs and move when a clearer freq is found or interference is encountered. I want them to listen to the environment before they commit to a freq. I want the uptime on a small internal battery that a cel phone has, and I want the portable RXs that we'd use in bag-rigs to be the size of cel phones as well. For this I would gladly pay considerably more per channel than I have already. Philip Perkins |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Acoustic mapping of spaces | Pro Audio | |||
Acoustic mapping of spaces | Pro Audio | |||
Acoustic mapping of spaces | Tech | |||
Acoustic mapping of spaces | Tech | |||
Studio spaces for sale in Chicago?? | Pro Audio |