Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
hank alrich wrote: geoff wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not in the case I described. The disc is recorded while the show's going on, and finalized well before I have the SR system loaded-out. But if you loaded out at 4 x realtime, then you could be finished and away before the act has even finished playing, Is it safe to smoke that stuff down under? g and have their CDs duplicated and printed for them to present at their finale. If I tried to load out at 4x, I'd never finish! "Where's Hank??" "Just of stage right; he's paralyzed!!" -- ha shut up and play your guitar |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hank alrich wrote:
If I tried to load out at 4x, I'd never finish! I think I have worked with some Teamsters like that. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#43
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"geoff" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. |
#44
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger wrote:
"geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. Riiiiiight ! So something live in realtime cannot be "pretty much stuck at burning at 1X". It is ABSOLUTELY stuck at 1 x ! geoff |
#45
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:34:50 +1300, "geoff"
wrote: But if you loaded out at 4 x realtime, then you could be finished and away before the act has even finished playing, and have their CDs duplicated and printed for them to present at their finale. Here in the States, the required pharmaceuticals are illegal, and, what's even worse, unavailable, these days. Probably just as well - they'd flat-out KILL the old guys responding to your challenge. Best to let these ancient geezers just amble along at their own (however decrepit...) paces. Please try to not stare and point, and especially to not yell discouraging things about the future of Social Security. Modern methods of Time Dilation would just be beyond their (necessarily - but what *can* you do?) limited mind-set. Oh, well. Best to just be kind, and to not mention, well, "you know what". Much thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck |
#46
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote: "geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. Riiiiiight ! So something live in realtime cannot be "pretty much stuck at burning at 1X". It is ABSOLUTELY stuck at 1 x ! I have a pianist who can play much faster than realtime. She can do the minute waltz in 40 seconds flat. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#47
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
geoff wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. Riiiiiight ! So something live in realtime cannot be "pretty much stuck at burning at 1X". It is ABSOLUTELY stuck at 1 x ! I have a pianist who can play much faster than realtime. She can do the minute waltz in 40 seconds flat. So the piano is out of tune, eh? -- ha shut up and play your guitar |
#48
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
geoff wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. Riiiiiight ! So something live in realtime cannot be "pretty much stuck at burning at 1X". It is ABSOLUTELY stuck at 1 x ! I have a pianist who can play much faster than realtime. She can do the minute waltz in 40 seconds flat. --scott Jeepers, the waltzers would all be tripping. geoff |
#49
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: geoff wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: The point is that those of us who use stand-alone audio CD recorders are pretty much stuck at burning at 1X, and it still works, even with common high speed media. However burning at 2 x realtime gets you home quicker. Not if you're recording something that is live in real time. Riiiiiight ! So something live in realtime cannot be "pretty much stuck at burning at 1X". It is ABSOLUTELY stuck at 1 x ! I have a pianist who can play much faster than realtime. She can do the minute waltz in 40 seconds flat. --scott Jeepers, the waltzers would all be tripping. geoff Like cool! I'll smoke to that. Later... Ron Capik -- |
#50
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
But if you loaded out at 4 x realtime, then you could be finished and away before the act has even finished playing You don't want to know how many times I've wanted to do just that. g -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#51
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
geoff wrote: But if you loaded out at 4 x realtime, then you could be finished and away before the act has even finished playing You don't want to know how many times I've wanted to do just that. g Letsee - I'm working a state choir festival that runs from 8 am to 9 pm. 5 groups an hour with two breaks. That's 13 hours elapsed time. I run my CD recorder at 4X, and I'm out of there by noon! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Realtime audio capture program? | Pro Audio | |||
PC recording question: Buffering realtime audio | Pro Audio | |||
PC recording question: Buffering realtime audio | Tech | |||
Realtime Audio Spectrum Analyzer...Any good? | Tech | |||
(2) new realtime audio morphing software - opinions? | Pro Audio |