Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 12:08*pm, Roy W. Rising
wrote: wrote: Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an advantage to *tracking and mixing at 96 k? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Glenn. As they say in court ... "Asked and answered" ... yesterday. And, by the way, it's "versus". *;-) -- ~ ~ Roy "If you notice the sound, it's wrong!" Sorry about the double post. My computer stopped updating saturday night? Until today. Glenn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing and tracking at 96k verses 44k?? | Pro Audio | |||
Mac verses PC | Pro Audio | |||
Wireless headphones for tracking and mixing? | Pro Audio | |||
Headphones for studio work (tracking/mixing) | Pro Audio | |||
DIGI 001 Verses 002 here we go? | Pro Audio |