[Arny Krueger]

"John Atkinson" wrote in
message

On Aug 20, 4:19 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message

On Aug 20, 1:36 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message

On Aug 19, 8:06 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote
in message

In yet another failed attempt to rewrite history,
Arny Krueger ha been refighting the battle of the
HE2005 debate over on r.a.h-e.

I hadn't noticed.

That's strange, Mr. Krueger. The following messages
posted by you between August 9 and August 12 in the
thread "Ultrabit Platium Disk Treatment" all refer to
what happened at the HE2005 debate:

Message-ID:
Message-ID:
Message-ID:

So this is all about 3 posts?

3 posts that showed my statement was correct, Mr.
Krueger.

No they don't.

Really? They don't show you trying to "rewrite history,"
Mr. Krueger? After all, I did get you to admit that your
comment about Michael Fremer was incorrect on most
aspects.

There's no need for me to refight a battle that I so
obviously won in the eyes of so many independent
sources.

"Independent sources"? Let me see what Google says...
Okay, there are two Usenet posters who repeatedly
declared you the winner, Mr. Krueger. One was ScottW...
I guess he's "independent." The other is...Arny Krueger.
With all due respect, Mr. Krueger, I hardly think your
opinion is "independent."

And I suspect that there would have been
more than 3, had not so many of your posts been
bounced back to you by the r.a.h-e moderators. :-)

Prove it.

In fact I have had zero posts bounced this year.

How's it go? Ah yes...prove it. :-)

Since you brought the issue up John, the burden of proof lies with you.

Oh, I forgot John, are above all that - you can say what you will and it
*must* be accepted as permanent truth. That's how you run Stereophile, so
why shouldn't the rest of the universe run by your rules? ;-)