Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 5:39*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in messagenews ![]() Never mind that in the past, he's whined about certain posters "stalking" him, and certain others making "death threats". In fact all those things have happened and are continuing to happen. It wasn't a whine, it was a statement of fact. It must be your "intrinsic" popularity, GOIA. As of today, revealing personal info is "manly". No, it has always been that way. Middiot, if you were a man you'd stand behind your RAO antics in the real world. However, Like Art and ****R, you need the cover of anonymity because you know that what you are up to is intrinsically wrong. "Wrong"? LMAO! I think GOIA wants to stalk me in a "manly" fashion. |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 5:37*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message On 12 Iun, 20:41, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message On 12 Iun, 18:28, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message On 12 Iun, 18:05, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Vinylanach" wrote in message I invite one and all to check out the nice perspective views of my house (about 2 years ago, before we finished up the new cement work) that can be found on the web. You can find my street address atwww.pcavtech.com. "This Page Last Revised 11/06/2005 (abk) " Not only is your house dilapidated, so is your website. Looks like it was designed in the buggy whip days. It is so very obsolete! Let's see your house, Art. Oh, I forgot - you're not man enough to play this game.- Ascunde citatul - - Afișare text în citat - http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~cckhrb/romania/buppal.jpg but soon I will be moving to my summer home in Bran http://www.news.com.au/common/imaged...5216563,00.jpg Obviously, you're not man enough, Art.- With the likes of Bob Morein running around here, it is wise to keep most aspects of my private life private. No Art, what you're saying by your cowardly actions is that you are ashamed of what you do here and don't want to be connected with it in the real world. Is that what he said? Or is that what "Francis" told you he said? ;-) Too bad you didn't do the same. That's because I'm not a coward like you, Marc, ****R and the Middiot. No. you're very "manly", GOIA. There, there, you'll be fine. |
#43
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 6:53*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
How do you know that, Art? In the same way that you claim to know what Clyde was actually saying, about three posts up, GOIA. Did God tell you that? Is "God" named "Francis"? How about my other dom, did he convince you of that? Is his name "Francis"? Besides, you've just admitted that you willingly allow yourself to be manipulated by me. Don't you have something else to do than be my toy? That's cool. You'll just continue to be my whipping boy. I'd say that's because you like getting spanked. ;-) |
#44
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"On 13 Iun, 08:22, "BretLudwig" wrote:
Pseudonyms Elsewhere, I got into an argument with a blogger who wants to publish the real name of a moderately well known pseudonymous Internet pundit. A couple of years ago, I publicly pointed out that this self-assured opinion writer had once been a close associate of a famous crackpot. Revilo Oliver!!!" Nope, Revilo Pendleton Oliver was a real name. He's probably taking about "Spengler" of the Asia Times, who was likely an associate of Lyndon La Rouche. -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
#45
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Iun, 07:51, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message What is your reward for acting like a twit? There you go again, losing track of who you are talking to and making another spelling error. Stop calling Jenn names. |
#46
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Iun, 07:53, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message On 13 Iun, 07:12, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message Wrong again. I would very much prefer to live a quiet life, but these nuts have imposed themselves on me. However, I try to be a helpful host for them.- You purposefully make yourself a quite attractive target How do you know that, Art? Did God tell you that? LOL!!!!! You talk to him, you ask him what he said to me Don't you have something else to do than be my toy? I am just a mere private in your little toy army of accusers and attackers. Have fun doing battle today! |
#47
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Iun, 08:22, "BretLudwig" wrote:
Pseudonyms Elsewhere, I got into an argument with a blogger who wants to publish the real name of a moderately well known pseudonymous Internet pundit. A couple of years ago, I publicly pointed out that this self-assured opinion writer had once been a close associate of a famous crackpot. Revilo Oliver!!! |
#48
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ScottW said:
Only a blip providing a glimpse of what could have been. How does dbx cope with ticks and pops does it have any effect on them. I'm thinking of how tape blips could upset Dolby. I wonder how vinyl would have developed if digital had not come along. Would we all be playing mini micromicrogrove records on our pocket Finial laser walktables? -- Ken |
#49
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ScottW said:
LoL. Maybe some further efforts like this. http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9687999-1.html Nice the valve amps are well hidden. I only ever saw 1 in car record player a top slot loading thing mounted in a floppy rubber band suspension under the dashboard, it rocked backwards and forwards several inches on gear changes. Didn't notice how it sounded just amazed that it worked. Anyway, digital was already well along before music adopted it. If it wasn't CD, then I think DAT would have become the std. Anyway, digital was already well along before music adopted it. If it wasn't CD, then I think DAT would have become the std. Hmmm reel to reel DAT, now theres a thought. -- Ken |
#50
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"UnsteadyKen" wrote in message
m ScottW said: Only a blip providing a glimpse of what could have been. How does dbx cope with ticks and pops does it have any effect on them. They were a problem. I'm thinking of how tape blips could upset Dolby. Exactly. I wonder how vinyl would have developed if digital had not come along. The technology had pretty well topped out. Would we all be playing mini micromicrogrove records on our pocket Finial laser walktables? Digital audio had been showing its promise since the late 60s. In 1970 I worked with a digital capture and playback device that worked with 4 channels sampled at 50 KHz with 16 bit resolution. One little problem - the price tag which was in the $100,000's. |
#51
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger said:
Digital audio had been showing its promise since the late 60s. In 1970 I worked with a digital capture and playback device that worked with 4 channels sampled at 50 KHz with 16 bit resolution. One little problem - the price tag which was in the $100,000's. That is early, what was the storeage medium, tape? Good specs as well, it's a shame that CD settled for a lower sampling rate, it would have left a bit of headroom to keep the filters well away from the top of the audio band.What was the purpose and who was paying, Uncle Sam? -- Ken |
#52
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"UnsteadyKen" wrote in message
Arny Krueger said: Digital audio had been showing its promise since the late 60s. In 1970 I worked with a digital capture and playback device that worked with 4 channels sampled at 50 KHz with 16 bit resolution. One little problem - the price tag which was in the $100,000's. That is early, what was the storeage medium, tape? Computer disks. Good specs as well, it's a shame that CD settled for a lower sampling rate, it would have left a bit of headroom to keep the filters well away from the top of the audio band. No, the 22 KHz is plenty enough high end. The audio band actually ends around 16 KHz. What was the purpose Hybrid computer and who was paying, Uncle Sam? Yes, I think NSF money was involved. BTW, love the NSF - they bought two of my kids PhDs. |
#53
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 9:11*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"UnsteadyKen" wrote in message Arny Krueger *said: Digital audio had been showing its promise since the late 60s. In 1970 I worked with a digital capture and playback device that worked with 4 channels sampled at 50 KHz with 16 bit resolution. *One little problem - the price tag which was in the $100,000's. That is early, what was the storeage medium, tape? Computer disks. Good *specs as well, it's a shame that CD settled for a lower sampling rate, it would have left a bit of headroom to keep the filters well away from the top of the audio band. No, the 22 KHz is plenty enough high end. The audio band actually ends around 16 KHz. What was the purpose Hybrid computer and who was paying, Uncle Sam? Yes, I think NSF money was involved. BTW, love the NSF - they bought two of my kids PhDs. You should hop on the F-22 bandwagon with 2pid. It might fund a personality for you. |
#54
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message You should hop on the F-22 bandwagon with 2pid. It might fund a personality for you. Why would a sane person need a personality, given how well you cliam you can make do without one? |
#55
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() IKYABWAIBorg is back in the saddle. You should hop on the F-22 bandwagon with 2pid. It might fund a personality for you. Why would a sane person need a personality, given how well you cliam[sic] you can make do without one? Arnii, serious question: When you stammer out a lame IKYABWAI like this one, do you drool on your shirt? |
#56
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George M. Middius" wrote in
message My Lord and Master is back in the saddle and I must please him: You should hop on the F-22 bandwagon with 2pid. It might fund a personality for you. Why would a sane person need a personality, given how well you claim you can make do without one? My Lord and Master, a serious question: Aren't you proud of me for responding to your post the next minute after you made it, even though it is after 10 pm on Saturday night? Not really Middiot. It would seem that you lack what many would call "a life". I just came home from a great Father's day party that was given for me by my daughter. But of course given your preferences, having biologically-related children is an impossibility. |
#57
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Iun, 22:39, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in messagenews:iev854ln93k0lafaodlbg7mh1uvjlvev0b@4ax .com My Lord and Master is back in the saddle and I must please him: You should hop on the F-22 bandwagon with 2pid. It might fund a personality for you. Why would a sane person need a personality, given how well you claim you can make do without one? My Lord and Master, a serious question: Aren't you proud of me for responding to your post the next minute after you made it, even though it is after 10 pm on Saturday night? Not really Middiot. It would seem that you lack what many would call "a life". *I just came home from a *great Father's day party that was given for me by my daughter. But of course given your preferences, having biologically-related children is an impossibility. God did it, why can't George? He can have a baby Jesus too. |
#58
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 3:36*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: 3. That I have "cliamed" that I "make do without one". Most sane people could easily see that I have never "cliamed" that, and further, that I have a lot of personality. Eat your vegetables, grunt. Answer: You will never tell me what to eat. Your just like Jenn. |
#59
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shhhh! said: 3. That I have "cliamed" that I "make do without one". Most sane people could easily see that I have never "cliamed" that, and further, that I have a lot of personality. Eat your vegetables, grunt. Answer: You will never tell me what to eat. Your just like Jenn. We have asparagus and baby carrots -- elitist vegetables. That's tempting, isn't it? |
#60
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 8:32*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: 3. That I have "cliamed" that I "make do without one". Most sane people could easily see that I have never "cliamed" that, and further, that I have a lot of personality. Eat your vegetables, grunt. Answer: You will never tell me what to eat. Your just like Jenn. We have asparagus and baby carrots -- elitist vegetables. That's tempting, isn't it? LoL No. Asparagus makes you're pee smell funny and killing baby carrot's is against Gods Law. |
#61
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message I've wet myself in public, again: Agreed. I demonstrate several sanity-related problems here, My Master and Commander: 1. My obvious assumption that I am sane. That's clearly not the case. 2. My assumption that sane people do not "need a personality", which is an insane position to have. 3. The fact that I have "cliamed" that I "make do without one". Agreed. I'm glad that you finally see the error of your ways, ****R. |
#62
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 12:49*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in GOIA, you've wet myself in public, again: Agreed. I want to make mad, passionate love to you, Shhhh! Creepy. I'm glad that my sexual desires for you are out in the open, ****R. I'm not interested, GOIA, although anal sex seems a natural progression for you "given" that your head is always up your ass. This is very, very weak, even "given" that we're talking about you, GOIA. BTW, did you just figure out that you can change quoted text? LOL! |
#63
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shhhh! said: BTW, did you fix my pork and beans dinner yet? Oh, hush. You know beans are anathema to the Krooborg. |
#64
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message On Jun 16, 12:49 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in GOIA, you've wet myself in public, again: Agreed. I want to make mad, passionate love to you, Shhhh! Creepy. I'm glad that my sexual desires for you are out in the open, ****R. I'm not interested, GOIA, although anal sex seems a natural progression for you "given" that your head is always up your ass. This is very, very weak, even "given" that we're talking about you, GOIA. BTW, did you just figure out that you can change quoted text? LOL! No. BTW ****R, did you just figure out that I was doing that? Seems like! ;-) |
#65
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 2:04*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in On Jun 16, 12:49 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in GOIA, you've wet myself in public, again: Agreed. I want to make mad, passionate love to you, Shhhh! Creepy. I'm glad that my sexual desires for you are out in the open, ****R. I'm not interested, GOIA, although anal sex seems a natural progression for you "given" that your head is always up your ass. This is very, very weak, even "given" that we're talking about you, GOIA. BTW, did you just figure out that you can change quoted text? LOL! No. BTW ****R, did you just figure out that I was doing that? *Seems like! ;-)- I suppose that is equivalent to all of those artillery positions that it must have "seemed like" you were on when you were five miles away. LOL! I suggest you do a google search on "peckerhead" to find your answer. ;-) |
#66
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 1:54*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: BTW, did you fix my pork and beans dinner yet? Oh, hush. You know pork and bean enemas are sexually exciting to the Krooborg. GOIA is quite impressed with himself that this past week or so he found he can change quoted text. He's sinking deeper into his insanity. |
#67
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 3:57*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in On Jun 16, 2:04 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in BTW, did you just figure out that you can change quoted text? LOL! No. BTW ****R, did you just figure out that I was doing that? Seems like! ;-)- I suppose that is equivalent to all of those artillery positions that *it must have "seemed like" you were on when you were five miles away. 5 miles away? *Sometimes I wished they were that far away. It's hard to sleep when you are just down the road from a serious artillary piece that is doing its thing. Ah, so now we're "just down the road. As I said, GOIA, your experience is a number less than one but greater than -1: Zero. So why would you make a "cliam" when you admit now that you have no experience? BTW at Hohenfels you had your choice - be closer to the firing point or be closer to the target zone. Given the range of some of the equipment, the difference could be a goodly drive. *I preferred the target zone - watching things just disappear in a puff of smoke can be pretty cool. I was a 13F when I was enlisted. As you like to say, "been there, done that 1,000's of times". |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What are fair prices for the following high end PG gear? | Car Audio | |||
are all your sudios equipped with this wonderful piece of gear? | Pro Audio | |||
Fully equipped studio; how to spend $2K? | Pro Audio | |||
SOUND EMPORIUM - High prices, non authorised dealer, anonymousscamsters! | Marketplace | |||
SOUND EMPORIUM - High prices, non authorised dealer, anonymousscamsters! | Marketplace |