Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK - I'll probably get blasted for this question, but here goes.
I have about $1500 I can invest in an all-around workhorse mic pre - a mono unit - channel strip device. I currently own a TC Gold Channel. Mics are BLUE Dragonfly, Ball and KickBall Violet Design Black Knight SM 57 - Beta58 recording to Digi002 It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. thanks so much Steve Hoover |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Hoover wrote:
OK - I'll probably get blasted for this question, but here goes. I have about $1500 I can invest in an all-around workhorse mic pre - a mono unit - channel strip device. I currently own a TC Gold Channel. Mics are BLUE Dragonfly, Ball and KickBall Violet Design Black Knight SM 57 - Beta58 recording to Digi002 It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. What don't you like about the Gold Channel? I'd recommend that if you have only one mike preamp that it be the most neutral one possible. And if you are recording to a digital system, you can probably dispense with all the other junk that comes along with a "channel strip" and just buy a straight preamp. The John Hardy is the first one that comes to mind, or the RNP. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Steve Hoover wrote: OK - I'll probably get blasted for this question, but here goes. I have about $1500 I can invest in an all-around workhorse mic pre - a mono unit - channel strip device. I currently own a TC Gold Channel. Mics are BLUE Dragonfly, Ball and KickBall Violet Design Black Knight SM 57 - Beta58 recording to Digi002 It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. What don't you like about the Gold Channel? I'd recommend that if you have only one mike preamp that it be the most neutral one possible. And if you are recording to a digital system, you can probably dispense with all the other junk that comes along with a "channel strip" and just buy a straight preamp. The John Hardy is the first one that comes to mind, or the RNP. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." The Gold Channel is fine - I just thought I might be able to improve my recording chain. thanks for the suggestions! |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Hoover" wrote in message
... I currently own a TC Gold Channel. Mics are BLUE Dragonfly, Ball and KickBall Violet Design Black Knight SM 57 - Beta58 It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. I'd recommend that if you have only one mike preamp that it be the most neutral one possible. And if you are recording to a digital system, you can probably dispense with all the other junk that comes along with a "channel strip" and just buy a straight preamp. The John Hardy is the first one that comes to mind, or the RNP. The Gold Channel is fine - I just thought I might be able to improve my recording chain. thanks for the suggestions! If it were me, I'd spend the money on a more neutral mic; I'm not familiar with the Violet or Kickball mics, but the rest of them are strongly on the bright side. For $1500 you could get a Microtech Gefell M930 (cardioid, a *little* bright but not relentless) or an M940 (hypercardioid and, if the curves are at all realistic, near-flat top end), plus an E-V RE20 (used, from e-bay). You wouldn't regret either purpose, and they'll give you very different tonal colors. Peace, Paul |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 May 2008 03:22:42 -0400, Paul Stamler wrote
(in article ): If it were me, I'd spend the money on a more neutral mic; I'm not familiar with the Violet or Kickball mics, but the rest of them are strongly on the bright side. For $1500 you could get a Microtech Gefell M930 (cardioid, a *little* bright but not relentless) or an M940 (hypercardioid and, if the curves are at all realistic, near-flat top end), plus an E-V RE20 (used, from e-bay). You wouldn't regret either purpose, and they'll give you very different tonal colors. Peace, Paul I'm thinking the same thing, Paul. Those particular Gefells are very nice. re20 is also useful. An Audio Technica AT4050 is also a good choice; fairly neutral, three patterns, pad, low cut. Very versatile. Somewhere around $550 with shockmount. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Hoover wrote:
The Gold Channel is fine - I just thought I might be able to improve my recording chain. thanks for the suggestions! Maybe, how will you know the recording chain is improved? Spend your money on monitoring. Upgrade your monitoring until you are able to hear something wrong with the recording chain. Then upgrade your recording chain. But if you can't hear it, you can't know if anything you do is making things better or worse. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" Spend your money on monitoring. Upgrade your monitoring until you are able to hear something wrong with the recording chain. Then upgrade your recording chain. But if you can't hear it, you can't know if anything you do is making things better or worse. --scott +1 Aforementioned worth repeating : (coda) "Steve Hoover" wrote: ... snip... snip.... I have about $1500 I can invest in an all-around workhorse mic pre - a mono unit......... .....It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. You know the (underrated) Grace 101 doesn't even cost a grand and I love how darn transparent it is. I had never heard my tonsils and adenoids (adnoise) [sic] were missing until I tried one. Bought two though. Warning for any children out there. If you plan on being a great singer one day or have asthma. "Do not let doctors take out your tonsils and/or your adenoids" I repeat : You have been warned! |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Steve Hoover" wrote: OK - I'll probably get blasted for this question, but here goes. I have about $1500 I can invest in an all-around workhorse mic pre - a mono unit - channel strip device. I currently own a TC Gold Channel. Mics are BLUE Dragonfly, Ball and KickBall Violet Design Black Knight SM 57 - Beta58 recording to Digi002 It would be used as a general purpose pre on everything from vocals to acoustic guitar to horns. Please share your experience and recommendations. thanks so much Steve Hoover Get a used Neve designed Amek 9098 eq/pre. The pre is fine and the eq will blow your mind. David Correia www.Celebrationsound.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS- API/ Brent Averill 312 pres, Tele V-72a tube pres | Pro Audio | |||
WTB- ATI 8MX-2 mic pres | Pro Audio | |||
WTB: Mic pres | Pro Audio | |||
Which of these two has "better" mic pres? | Pro Audio | |||
Guitar Pres? | Pro Audio |