Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 11:19*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 10, 2:22*pm, George M. Middius wrote: John Atkinson said: The irony is that Stereophile has occasionally done SBTs and DBTs and personally I have taken part in more than 100 since my first in the spring of 1977. My rejection of them as a *general reviewing tool is based on that considerable experience. That just shows you're short on faith. Remind me again how many blind tests ScottW has taken part in? That's really unfair, you know. Scottie is hoping to reshape the consumer audio industry from inside the "debating trade" dimension, where reality is unwelcome. Not that is ironic. *George invoking reality. Not (sic) 2pid's utter lack of self-awareness. *LoL. (sic) I agree. Yap yap yap. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roots of the hobby | Vacuum Tubes | |||
A laundry-list of why DBTs are used | Audio Opinions | |||
Good old DBTs | Audio Opinions | |||
Power Conditioners - DBTs? | High End Audio |