Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lord Hasenpfeffer" wrote in message ... David Morgan (MAMS) wrote: Gee !!! My first question to you was, "What encoders have you studied?" Your reply essentially? 'Only the one I got for free'. That is correct. I have heard MP3s in the past which were obviously poorly made. With notlame, however, I have not been able to produce a single MP3 which has offended my ears other than those which were made from older, quieter WAVs ripped from older, quieter CDs. "normalize" solved that problem for me, therefore, I have no complaints with my encoder. Myke Without experimenting with codecs and much listening, you will never know. At least we know, that to you, louder is psychoacoustically 'better'. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio |