[[email protected]]

I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

[Kalman Rubinson]

On 7 Feb 2008 03:12:37 GMT, wrote:

I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

Lots and lots. What other features are you looking for? Is there a
defined budget?

Kal

[Guido Neitzer]

wrote:

I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

Rotel RC-1070 for example. Sells for $499.

cug

--
http://www.event-s.net

[[email protected]]

I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

Lots and lots. What other features are you looking for? Is there a
defined budget?

Two channel, minimal functions, no phono input, tape in/out, at least
two source inputs, quiet; as inexpensive as possible.

Thanks.

[Norman M. Schwartz]

wrote in message
...
I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

Lots and lots. What other features are you looking for? Is there a
defined budget?

Two channel, minimal functions, no phono input, tape in/out, at least
two source inputs, quiet; as inexpensive as possible.


I bought and continue to use the first generation of one of these:
http://www.parasound.com/zcustom/zpre2.php
It never failed to serve me well.
Norman

Thanks.

[Kalman Rubinson]

On 8 Feb 2008 03:10:52 GMT, wrote:

I'm looking for a preamp with remote. I saw one nad model, are there
others? Inexpensive is fine.

Lots and lots. What other features are you looking for? Is there a
defined budget?

Two channel, minimal functions, no phono input, tape in/out, at least
two source inputs, quiet; as inexpensive as possible.

The NAD that was already suggested suits. Also, for really cheap, you
might find a used AR SRC which fits your description. I bought one
for $100.

Kal

[bob]

On Feb 7, 10:10*pm, wrote:

Two channel, minimal functions, no phono input, tape in/out, at least
two source inputs, quiet; as inexpensive as possible.

The lowest cost would be a stereo receiver with pre-outs. Lots listed
he http://snipurl.com/1z9nu. Not sure which have pre-outs, so
you'll have to do a little digging.

Of course, that means owning a stereo receiver, which is so not high-
end. But preamps alone will probably cost you more.

bob

[Ted[_8_]]

On Feb 8, 4:50*pm, bob wrote:
On Feb 7, 10:10*pm, wrote:

Two channel, minimal functions, no phono input, tape in/out, at least
two source inputs, quiet; as inexpensive as possible.

The lowest cost would be a stereo receiver with pre-outs. Lots listed
hehttp://snipurl.com/1z9nu. Not sure which have pre-outs, so
you'll have to do a little digging.

Of course, that means owning a stereo receiver, which is so not high-
end. But preamps alone will probably cost you more.

bob

McIntosh C-38 with remote