Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage
electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 I will be using a Harmon-Kardon Citation 16 to drive them, which is stable at a 2-ohm nominal load. So power and amp stability is not at issue. I also have a Scott LK-150 if I want to drive them with tubes. Thoughts? Suggestions? Pass? I am in no hurry for yet another pair of speakers, so I could pass on these for now without pain or regret - even if they are 'free'. The room they would be serving is 14 feet x 25 feet and with a 10 foot ceiling, two glass-paned French doors to the exterior, large window, fireplace and paneled French entry door. Floors are carpeted hardwood, walls are horsehair plaster, furniture is 'comfortable' but the room will be pretty lively. Thanks in advance. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Magnaplanars are not electrostatic speakers.
Kal On 24 Jan 2008 23:10:37 GMT, Peter Wieck wrote: If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 I will be using a Harmon-Kardon Citation 16 to drive them, which is stable at a 2-ohm nominal load. So power and amp stability is not at issue. I also have a Scott LK-150 if I want to drive them with tubes. Thoughts? Suggestions? Pass? I am in no hurry for yet another pair of speakers, so I could pass on these for now without pain or regret - even if they are 'free'. The room they would be serving is 14 feet x 25 feet and with a 10 foot ceiling, two glass-paned French doors to the exterior, large window, fireplace and paneled French entry door. Floors are carpeted hardwood, walls are horsehair plaster, furniture is 'comfortable' but the room will be pretty lively. Thanks in advance. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa Not electrostatic 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) The only electrostats in the list. 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 Not electrostatic |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:10:37 -0800, Peter Wieck wrote
(in article ): If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 I will be using a Harmon-Kardon Citation 16 to drive them, which is stable at a 2-ohm nominal load. So power and amp stability is not at issue. I also have a Scott LK-150 if I want to drive them with tubes. Thoughts? Suggestions? Pass? I am in no hurry for yet another pair of speakers, so I could pass on these for now without pain or regret - even if they are 'free'. The room they would be serving is 14 feet x 25 feet and with a 10 foot ceiling, two glass-paned French doors to the exterior, large window, fireplace and paneled French entry door. Floors are carpeted hardwood, walls are horsehair plaster, furniture is 'comfortable' but the room will be pretty lively. Thanks in advance. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Nobody, can, of course, make your decision for you, but I know all of these speakers well. Here are my thoughts on each: 1. Magnaplanar SMGa By far the best sounding of the bunch. While not electrostatic (all Maggies are planar-dynamic. That means that they have a "voice grid" glued to the diaphragm and this grid is placed between the poles of magnets that are lined-up in rows on the steel screen in front of the speaker. When a signal goes through the wires it creates a magnetic field which is alternately attracted to and repelled at an audio rate by the permanent magnets affixed to the screen in front of the diaphragm. This causes the diaphragm to move and produce sound). The SMGs are small speakers in that they are only about 4 ft high and about 2 ft wide and 1.5 inches deep, but they are later technology than the MG-1 and therefore much better. Not a lot of bass (50 Hz) and nothing much above 15KHz, but very clean and musical. 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) The Acoustats have a dynamic range problem that's really annoying. The transformers that feed the electrostatic elements aren't very well designed seem to saturate very easily causing a nasty dynamic compression whereby the music, when it is supposed to get louder, doesn't. It reaches a point where it just gets squashed and sounds more and more congested and distorted the louder the performers play. Also, the cone woofer is a very poor mate to the ES panels. When I had a pair, I replaced the cone woofers that came in them with a pair of raw 8-inchers from Radio Shack of all places and it was a big improvement! These speakers are a lot like Martin-Logans but nowhere near as good. I'd stay away. 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 MG-1 are the original Magnepan MG series. They have heavy diaphragms and heavy aluminum wire voice grids. The voice grids are are glued to the diaphragm using a goop-like greenish-gray glue that, when hit by ultraviolet light, changes its chemical properties and starts to eat the aluminum wire, eventually causing the voice grid to fail. All early Magnaplanar speakers have this problem, and even working ones have voice grids that have eaten away to almost nothing in places. They may work today and for years to come or one of them may fail tomorrow (that problem had been solved by the time that the SMGa came along). Also the magnets used on the MG-1 are very weak compared to later models (they are essentially the 3M flexible "refrigerator door" magnets), so the MG-1 are very inefficient and require a lot of power. Thirdly, the thick, heavy mylar diaphragm has poor bass response (60 Hz) for their size and not much in the way of highs. They were novel in 1975, but not really very good speakers. The first MG to sound decent was the MG-2 and it too had the problem of the glue eating the voice grid. I know that you can send the speakers back to Magnepan and have them rebuilt, and I'm sure that the rebuilt ones use the newest thin, light mylar and a lighter voice grid and new glues that don't attack the wire, but I can't say how much that improves their performance. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 24, 8:09*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa Not electrostatic 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) The only electrostats in the list. 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 Not electrostatic OK... and fine, and thanks. But the question remains: of the three, which would _you_ pick for the need? Or none? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 24, 8:17*pm, Sonnova wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:10:37 -0800, Peter Wieck wrote (in article ): If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 I will be using a Harmon-Kardon Citation 16 to drive them, which is stable at a 2-ohm nominal load. So power and amp stability is not at issue. I also have a Scott LK-150 if I want to drive them with tubes. Thoughts? Suggestions? Pass? I am in no hurry for yet another pair of speakers, so I could pass on these for now without pain or regret - even if they are 'free'. The room they would be serving is 14 feet x 25 feet and with a 10 foot ceiling, two glass-paned French doors to the exterior, large window, fireplace and paneled French entry door. Floors are carpeted hardwood, walls are horsehair plaster, furniture is 'comfortable' but the room will be pretty lively. Thanks in advance. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Nobody, can, of course, make your decision for you, but I know all of these speakers well. Here are my thoughts on each: 1. Magnaplanar SMGa By far the best sounding of the bunch. While not electrostatic (all Maggies are planar-dynamic. That means that they have a "voice grid" glued to the diaphragm and this grid is placed between the poles of magnets that are lined-up in rows on the steel screen in front of the speaker. When a signal goes through the wires it creates a magnetic field which is alternately attracted to and repelled at an audio rate by the permanent magnets affixed to the screen in front of the diaphragm. This causes the diaphragm to move and produce sound). The SMGs are small speakers in that they are only about 4 ft high and about 2 ft wide and 1.5 inches deep, but they are later technology than the MG-1 and therefore much better. Not a lot of bass (50 Hz) and nothing much above 15KHz, but very clean and musical. 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) The Acoustats have a dynamic range problem that's really annoying. The transformers that feed the electrostatic elements aren't very well designed seem to saturate very easily causing a nasty dynamic compression whereby the music, when it is supposed to get louder, doesn't. It reaches a point where it just gets squashed and sounds more and more congested and distorted the louder the performers play. Also, the cone woofer is a very poor mate to the ES panels. When I had a pair, I replaced the cone woofers that came in them with a pair of raw 8-inchers from Radio Shack of all places and it was a big improvement! These speakers are a lot like Martin-Logans but nowhere near as good. I'd stay away. 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 MG-1 are the original Magnepan MG series. They have heavy diaphragms and heavy aluminum wire voice grids. The voice grids are are glued to the diaphragm using a goop-like greenish-gray glue that, when hit by ultraviolet light, changes its chemical properties and starts to eat the aluminum wire, eventually causing the voice grid to fail. All early Magnaplanar speakers have this problem, and even working ones have voice grids that have eaten away to almost nothing in places. They may work today and for years to come or one of them may fail tomorrow (that problem had been solved by the time that the SMGa came along). Also the magnets used on the MG-1 are very weak compared to later models (they are essentially the 3M flexible "refrigerator door" magnets), so the MG-1 are very inefficient and require a lot of power. Thirdly, the thick, heavy mylar diaphragm has poor bass response (60 Hz) for their size and not much in the way of highs. They were novel in 1975, but not really very good speakers. The first MG to sound decent was the MG-2 and it too had the problem of the glue eating the voice grid. I know that you can send the speakers back to Magnepan and have them rebuilt, and I'm sure that the rebuilt ones use the newest thin, light mylar and a lighter voice grid and new glues that don't attack the wire, but I can't say how much that improves their performance. *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Many thanks. We are going with the SMGa units. One other individual chimed in off-line giving the same wisdom. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Wieck wrote:
If allowed (and I have been) to choose any one pair of semi-vintage electrostatic speakers that: a) are working properly. b) have been checked by a reliable technician to verify a) above. c) they will be given to me at no cost as a return on a past favor, so there is really no reason to lean towards one over another nor any 'cost difference'. 1. Magnaplanar SMGa 2. Acustat Spectra 11 (not sure on that part number) 3. Magnaplanar MG-1 I will be using a Harmon-Kardon Citation 16 to drive them, which is stable at a 2-ohm nominal load. So power and amp stability is not at issue. I also have a Scott LK-150 if I want to drive them with tubes. Thoughts? Suggestions? Pass? I am in no hurry for yet another pair of speakers, so I could pass on these for now without pain or regret - even if they are 'free'. The room they would be serving is 14 feet x 25 feet and with a 10 foot ceiling, two glass-paned French doors to the exterior, large window, fireplace and paneled French entry door. Floors are carpeted hardwood, walls are horsehair plaster, furniture is 'comfortable' but the room will be pretty lively. Thanks in advance. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA Does your note mean that you can get ANY semi-vintage speakers that meet your criteria, or only any of the three speakers listed? If the former, I think that you should consider some larger/better choices. - You have quite a large room, and I think larger speakers would be a better choice. If you like the Maggies (though not electrostatic, as already mentioned), consider the 1.6 or 3.6 (sometimes available used) along with a sub of some kind. Jim Cate |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 28, 6:32*pm, JimC wrote:
Does your note mean that you can get ANY semi-vintage speakers that meet your criteria, or only any of the three speakers listed? * Just of the three listed. But I have a considerable range of speakers already in the inventory, including AR3a, ARM5, AR Athena (sub-sat), Revox Piccolo (sub-sat) and several similar around and between. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DIY electrostatic speakers | Tech | |||
Electrostatic speakers for $700.00 | Audio Opinions | |||
FA: Janszen Electrostatic Speakers | Marketplace | |||
FA: Janszen Electrostatic Speakers | Marketplace | |||
FA: Janszen Electrostatic Speakers | Vacuum Tubes |