Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
Ian Iveson Ian Iveson is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 960
Default Wouldn't cylinders have been better for reproduction than platters?

videochas wrote:

*****
Only if the vertical modulation was not used. Cylinders
were made by
the Edison company, and they consisted of a series of peaks
and
valleys. That doesn't work well for high frequencies
because the
stylus doesn't have time to fall back into the valley before
the next
peak comes along.

*****

Why not? Ratio of sprung to unsprung weight must be high for
both lateral and vertical tracking. There should be no
difference in terms of max acceleration, surely? But maybe
gravity contributes to even harmonics at low frequency?

Ian

HTML is inconvenient.


 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about acrylic vs. glass turntable platters JBColeman Audio Opinions 10 April 12th 06 03:05 PM
Newbie Q little black cylinders gugga Car Audio 6 January 26th 04 07:22 PM
Transfer of Edison Cylinders? P Stamler Pro Audio 10 October 23rd 03 03:08 PM
Recording on wax cylinders? William Sommerwerck Pro Audio 5 July 15th 03 06:56 PM
Edison cylinders: any value? Beanstudio Mastering Pro Audio 6 July 7th 03 06:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"