[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 17, 12:56*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 17 Ian, 12:01, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Jan 17, 5:42*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 16 Ian, 23:43, Eeyore
wrote:

Clyde Slick wrote:
*"Harry Lavo" wrote:

Remember Sinclair Lewis "when facism comes to America, it will come in the
guise of religion".

was he thinking of an imam?

Or Huckabee ?

I am alittle more scared of the Islamofascists.
All Huckabee wants tio destroy is the IRS

The attitude of someone who wants to replace the law of the land with
"god's law" is identical, regardless of which religion it is. That's a
point that neither you or your dog-loving buddy understand. Both are
very dangerous.

I agree, bit the Islamofascists are waaaay ahead on that concept.

Which do you find more likely in the short-term to "take over" in the
US? In combat, military officers are preparing to meet the challenges
expected in the the next 24-48 hours while keeping an eye on what to
expect in 48-72+ hours. In your learned opinion, have the
Islamofacists become so all-powerful that they are the immediate
threat?

LOL!!! not in 24 hours, but they are a more immediate danger.

The point was that you array your forces to meet the immediate danger,
while keeping an eye on and preparing for the "over the hill" danger.
In combat, it's the next 24 hours you are concerned with. "Over the
hill" is 48+ hours.

We disagree on the imminent danger. I do not think the Islamofacists
are the immediate danger in the US. I think they fall under the "over
the hill" danger. I think the folks like Huckabee are a much more
immediate threat to our society.

BTW, a few terrorist attacks, while indeed frightful, will not topple
the US. As I've said many times, if someone wants to hit us, they
likely will. No defense is 100% effective, "at least" while
maintaining individual freedom.