Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boris Lau wrote:
Hm, maybe. I really liked the idea of the Fig.-8, as suggested by Ty and others. So keep in mind that the frequency response of a directional mics is only perfect on axis. As I don't own a fig-8-mic I don't know how much the high end is dropped close to the nulls. The frequency plot published by the manufacturer (hopefully) consists of two plots: one being the frequency response on axis and the other plot should be a set of concentric circles for an omni or a set of concentric 8s in your case. Each 8 describes the response at a specified frequency depending on the angle. The higher the frequency the more distorted is the figure 8. Have you had a look at the frequency plots of your mic? Norbert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Something Lacking in My Recording - Can anyone help? | Pro Audio | |||
flac lacking descriptive info? | Tech | |||
radio bass lacking | Car Audio | |||
Way to artificially introduce highs into old recording? | Pro Audio | |||
Way to artificially introduce highs into old recording? | Tech |