Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note moderators, I am sending this from my AT&T account,
because I could not find the thread on the Google groups pages, even though I did my initial commentary from that source. So goes the strangeness of computerland. Nousaine wrote: (Howard Ferstler) wrote: (Nousaine) wrote Now stop that. My 15-inch subwoofer will produce 120 dB SPL @ 20 Hz @ 2-meters with less than 10% distortion. Just because I need 8 15-inch drivers with 23mm Xmax doesn't mean it can't be done What kind of music or home-theater reproduction requires that kind of subwoofer output power, Tom? Eric Bush confirmed several years ago that modern cd recordings can have significant frequency content as low as 6 Hz. I own such a collection of cds. I have a couple like that, myself. However, I would say that few of those discs that exhibit super-low content have much to offer in the way of meaningful music aesthetics. It may be fun to experience the low, low rumble or booms of such discs maybe one or two or three times (the second and third times being show-off sessions for a guest), but listening to such material over and over for musical enjoyment is certainly not something I would care to do - and I doubt that most music enthusiasts would care to do so, either. The fact is that most digital recordings (particularly the dull baroque and classical stuff I listen to for pleasure) do not have all that much super-low bass, and in many cases the super-low bass certain discs have are hall-noise artifacts that are more annoying than musically significant. Many recording engineers would like to get rid of such anomalies rather than have them reproduced. My goal for subwoofers was partially based on Tom Holman's observation that 122 dB SPL at low frequencies may be a useful dynamic headroom limit. For what? I certainly do not know of any live, acoustic music situation that would require something like that. Well, I take that back. I attended a Stan Kenton concert years ago and even at the back of the hall the high-octane sound from the trumpets was unsettling. However, no subwoofer would be required to handle that kind of material. I have doubts that any midrange and tweeter combination in a home-audio system could deal with it, either. This system will play any recorded program (which includes environmental sounds such as radial engined aricraft, thunderstorms, trains and artillery) with no dynamic limits. Fun for some, but not for me. I guess I am getting old. As a product reviewer, I have three systems at my place for reference purposes as well as pleasure. One has a big Velodyne F1800RII for main-channel work and a Hsu TN1220 for the center. (The Hsu is not really needed, but I had the sub on hand and so I put it to work.) The second has a "modified" SVS 16-46PC. The "modified" latter has the enclosure inverted, with the driver facing up, Hsu style, and with the grill replaced by another spaced-off wooden disc to reduce grill-screen noise. In addition, the driver is upgraded to a considerably heavier-duty, 12-inch TC systems job, and with the amp power changed from 190 to 320 watts. (An upcoming article by me in The Sensible Sound will discuss this mod, and a still later article will involve a comparison between it and the Hsu TN1220 and also between it and one of the SVS "Ultra" subs.) The third system has a Velodyne FSR-12 servo that is small but decently potent in the area it occupies. The three systems occupy rooms of 3,400, 2,900, and 2,000 cubic feet, and in each case the subs can generate all the low-bass realism required with any acoustic music one might want to listen to, and the two bigger ones can generate all the home-theater, adventure movie bass the walls can stand. All are capable of going solid to 20 Hz, with the modified SVS job strong right down to 17 Hz. Is going beyond that point kind of gilding the lily when it comes to practical subwoofer performance in typical home-listening rooms? I mean, if one wants to generate "greater than reality" SPL levels (sound-effects clashes, or whatever) or frequencies below what one would hear at any live concert (certainly, any classical-music concert that did not include a pipe organ) then maybe a wall-cracking subwoofer is OK. ANY recording known at reference level. But, again, this is a reference system used for professional evaluation. I've never claimed that everybody needs one. Actually, I feel similarly about the systems I mentioned above. My subs can easily get under the low-end sounds of the vast bulk of the musical and home-theater material I have encountered as a reviewer and enthusiast. In my three rooms, all can easily deliver realistically high levels down to 20 Hz, and none roll off appreciably down to that frequency. At the high levels that I occasionally use when testing subs, I find that my rooms generate so many noise artifacts of their own (wall-hung pictures, windows, doors, and shelf-located knick-knacks rattling aplenty) that worrying about the sound of the sub itself becomes secondary. On the other hand, at levels that simulate a live-music event (note that this does not include rock-concert live sound, since I never attend such get togethers anyway) the room noises disappear and my own subs just loaf along. No need for them to be able to play louder or lower - even for product- and music-reviewing purposes. Sure, there may be an occasional boomer recording (CD or DVD) that should tax a typical super sub (as opposed to a home-built super-duper sub played at levels one would never encounter at either a live, acoustic-instrument concert or in a killer-grade movie theater), but I do not think that kind of recording is something most people would miss if they never heard it. And while you note that your system is used for professional evaluation, you also note that not everybody needs one for that kind of performance. The reason most do not need it is that most do not listen to material of a kind that would require a sub of that kind to be installed in their homes. Hence, having a system that can deal with that kind of material at those frequencies and at those levels is not based upon a need to "reference" material that anyone would normally purchase. All one needs for reference work is a system that would equal, or maybe slightly surpass, what a serious, realism-oriented music or home-theater enthusiast would want. However, I find that kind of excess to be just that: excess when it comes to practical home-music or home-theater listening requirements. Supporting this kind of mega-subwoofer overkill probably misleads a lot of audio enthusiasts who are mainly in it for the musical or home-theater satisfaction, as opposed to owning what is essentially a sound-effects-recording "rumbler" for the living room. You may also be excluding the crop of car-audio enthusiasts who are used to getting 120 dB SPL in their cars. Shouldn't they be allowed to experience this level of performance at home too? Well, adult people should be allowed to do what they want, including wrecking their hearing. (OK, loud bass will not normally do that, but if we are talking about flat output then we are going to have to admit that frequencies above the bass range will be equally loud, and those can harm one's hearing.) Actually, I find car "hi-fi" to be an oxymoron, because there is just no way to get "realistic" musical sound from a motor vehicle that is generating road and motor noise. Again, I say this as a baroque and classical freak who likes quiet backgrounds underneath his music. OK, I am a fuddy duddy, but I must say that it mystifies me that anyone would want 120-dB sounds in their cars or in their home systems. However, I suppose that if someone wants to have 120-dB bass at 15 Hz in their car or living room they should go ahead and have it. Not my bag, but to be truthful a lot of things that people do are not my bag. Rather than invest in a overkill subwoofer (as opposed to one that is just strong and solid right down to 20 Hz or a tad below), perhaps the individual should back off a bit and put their surplus cash into additional recordings, a superior surround processor, or better satellite speakers. Fully agreed. And I have to agree with you when it comes to individuals who want to really pull out all the subwoofer stops. However, I do not think that super-duper subwoofer performance is particularly important when it comes to most musical or home-theater situations. Actually, it almost looks like an automotive horsepower race, rather than something that relates to the accurate reproduction of live-music-style sound. Subwoofers are fine, and I would not do without one for a minute. However, one can go a bit over the top, I think. IMO there is no such thing as over-the-top for dynamic capability. If I have a system that would produce 120 dB SPL+ (using 2 meters distance) over the complete human sensory range in a very quiet room than you can play anything from a soft breeze to a black powder cannon at reference level. No doubt. However, the vast bulk of all recordings are not in this category. I suppose for me the question involves whether we are talking about an audio system as a musical (or home-theater) reproducer or whether we are talking about a device that is basically a sound-effects machine that makes use of exotic recordings as source material. OTOH if you are a person who has no recordings that ever approach dynamics limits of the media than you only need the dynamic capability required of the source material. But, I know of only a handful of DIY systems that have anything that comes near to reproducing the true low frequency dynamics of known commercially avaliable cds. Again, there are commercially available CDs that are maybe as you say, but I would guess that they are musical dead ends - at least by my rarefied standards. I mean, I have a copy of one or two Bass Mekanic discs that certainly go low enough. (I got these to help me evaluate subs and not to listen to for fun. Indeed, I would go out of my mind if I had to listen to them for musical pleasure.) Ironically, I had a buddy from out of town drop in some time back and I put one of the discs on for him and he flipped out. He went out and bought a copy (and probably purchased other Mekanik discs, too, for all I know), and now he listens to them for pleasure! He has a pair of Velodyne HGS-15 subs, and I suppose they do the trick pretty good, even if they will not go all the way to the bottom. Takes all kinds. Howard Ferstler |