Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey everyone, i am about to make my first attempt at building some
front firing home theater subwoofer cabinets, and i'm looking for a little advice. I know a lot about how to build the cabinets but what i am looking for is some reassurance that the size of my cabinets will be sufficient and perform optimally. I am building each cabinet to house a single 12" woofer pushing around 200 watts. i'm not sure if the speakers are long throw or short (i got them for free), but if it helps, the rubber suspension stands about 3/8" out from the frame of each speaker. The outside dimensions i have decided to make my cabs are... 18" tall 15" wide 13" deep with a 1"x13" rectangular vent at the at the bottom on the front (13" because i will be using 1" MDF and the outside width is 15") the biggest things i need to know are... is this cabinet big enough to get a good tone from my subwoofer? if not what can i do to improve it? is my reflex vent large enough and how deep should it be? any suggestions or advice is welcome, thanks almfreak |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ps.com... Hey everyone, i am about to make my first attempt at building some front firing home theater subwoofer cabinets, and i'm looking for a little advice. I know a lot about how to build the cabinets but what i am looking for is some reassurance that the size of my cabinets will be sufficient and perform optimally. I am building each cabinet to house a single 12" woofer pushing around 200 watts. i'm not sure if the speakers are long throw or short (i got them for free), but if it helps, the rubber suspension stands about 3/8" out from the frame of each speaker. The outside dimensions i have decided to make my cabs are... 18" tall 15" wide 13" deep with a 1"x13" rectangular vent at the at the bottom on the front (13" because i will be using 1" MDF and the outside width is 15") the biggest things i need to know are... is this cabinet big enough to get a good tone from my subwoofer? if not what can i do to improve it? is my reflex vent large enough and how deep should it be? any suggestions or advice is welcome, thanks almfreak What you are attempting to do will almost certainly end in disappointment. Cabinet and vent sizing is related to the Theil-Small parameters of the drive units, and consequently, as you don't know what those are for your particular drive units, you can't get the cabinet and vents sized correctly. I would get a program like BoxPlot which will calculate the box and vent sizes from the T-S parameters, and use drive units whose parameters you know. You'll be doing a lot of work in carpentry, and it would be a pity if it was all for nothing. You can get BoxPlot from here. http://www.speakerbuilding.com/softw...e/boxplot3.zip S. http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 5:07 pm, wrote:
Hey everyone, i am about to make my first attempt at building some front firing home theater subwoofer cabinets, and i'm looking for a little advice. I know a lot about how to build the cabinets but what i am looking for is some reassurance that the size of my cabinets will be sufficient and perform optimally. I am building each cabinet to house a single 12" woofer pushing around 200 watts. i'm not sure if the speakers are long throw or short (i got them for free), but if it helps, the rubber suspension stands about 3/8" out from the frame of each speaker. The outside dimensions i have decided to make my cabs are... 18" tall 15" wide 13" deep with a 1"x13" rectangular vent at the at the bottom on the front (13" because i will be using 1" MDF and the outside width is 15") the biggest things i need to know are... is this cabinet big enough to get a good tone from my subwoofer? if not what can i do to improve it? is my reflex vent large enough and how deep should it be? any suggestions or advice is welcome, Without any knowledge of the actual operating parameters of the woofer, there's a high probability that your cabinet design is wrong. You don't even have enough information to determined whether a vent appropriate for the design or not (it's quite possible that a vented design is a bad idea for these woofers). There's certainly nothing to prevent you from just putting it all together and being done with it. But if your question is what is the optimum design for the system, or even what's suitable design, without the information on the woofers, your chances of success are very low. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well, you're right, since these woofers were given to me for free, i'm
not really sure of the specs, but i did find a brand sticker on the drivers. It says "Audio Concepts" and nothing more. there is a number printed on the side of the magnet itself it reads "1172492/12147". i've searched online for quite some time trying to find any information i can on these but i can't find any such brand that sells just the speakers without a cabinet. i dont know what else to do? any ideas? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i cant find any information on the brand, so i have no way to contact
a manufacturer. the only thing i know is that they are "Audio Concepts" brand, and i can't find any information on this brand. There are a few companies out there online with this name, but none of them sell drivers by themselves. one company sells a 12" powered subwoofer, but i have no way of being sure that my driver matches the one in this product... all i know is that mine are 12" drivers with dual 8 voice coils. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i read somewhere that if you dont know what a woofer's specs are you
can make a general guess based on the driver diameter. i.e. 12" driver means your cabinet should be some multiple of 1 cubic foot. Is there any validity to this for ported or unported cabs? |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also, those first box specifications i came up with, i created by
taking the measurements of an 18inch Peavey PA subwoofer, and decreased them by a ratio of 12/18. i figured that would be a ballpark estimate if i'm going to be building a high power sub. the reflex port measurement i generated by using an online calculator that estimates the port size based on the diameter of the driver and the maximum reflexion of the driver (which i estimated by measuring the suspension) at a certain frequency. i used 50Hz because it seemed that 50Hz seemed to cause the most reflexion and was reproduced louder that most other frequencies. are these legitimate guesses? or crap? |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 12:10 pm, wrote:
i read somewhere that if you dont know what a woofer's specs are you can make a general guess based on the driver diameter. Yeah, I read that two. It's still not right, though. i.e. 12" driver means your cabinet should be some multiple of 1 cubic foot. Is there any validity to this for ported or unported cabs? There is no validity. Take two cases: the 12: woofer in an AR3A is in a 1.4 cubic foot box. The optimum volume for one of the old Peerless 12" woofers in a vented cabinet was about 4 cubic feet. Making a vented system using a typical musical instrument speaker with a goal of maximum flat bandwidth could easily lead to an enclosure volume of a dozen cubic feet. So, yes, it should be "some multiple" of 1 cubic foot. Whether that multiple is 1.4, 4 or 12 depends upon the very nature of the 12" driver. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 12:18 pm, wrote:
also, those first box specifications i came up with, i created by taking the measurements of an 18inch Peavey PA subwoofer, and decreased them by a ratio of 12/18. Sorry, that won't work. Even given the most simplifying assumptions, it's wrong. consider, for example, the moving mass of the cone. All other things being equal, it's NOT going to go as 12/18, but it's going to go as the SQUARE of that ratio. So instead of a ratio of 2/3 (12/18), it's more like a ratio of less than 1/2 (144/324). And that's just ONE parameter. Making simplifying assumptions like this is almost guaranteed to lead you to a bad design. And i figured that would be a ballpark estimate if i'm going to be building a high power sub. the reflex port measurement i generated by using an online calculator that estimates the port size based on the diameter of the driver and the maximum reflexion of the driver (which i estimated by measuring the suspension) at a certain frequency. It would do you well to use the lingua franca of the domain. "maximum reflexion of the driver" has no standardized meaning. As such, it would appear that you are confusing the temr "Resonant frequency," and, if so, the method you suggested you used will NOT lead to any meaningful result. are these legitimate guesses? or crap? Crap. Simple as that. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 12:18 pm, wrote:
are these legitimate guesses? or crap? Look, every single person has told you essentially the same story: without the parameters, you're shooting in the dark. ONe person did give you a path out that has a reasonable chance of giving you a usable design, but it can't use a port. You can ignore the informed advice being given you, but you do so at your own peril. All of the methods you suggested thus far are NOT going to work. Everyone has pointed this out. Is their a reason why you doubt this? |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote ...
wrote: are these legitimate guesses? or crap? Look, every single person has told you essentially the same story: without the parameters, you're shooting in the dark. ONe person did give you a path out that has a reasonable chance of giving you a usable design, but it can't use a port. You can ignore the informed advice being given you, but you do so at your own peril. All of the methods you suggested thus far are NOT going to work. Everyone has pointed this out. Is their a reason why you doubt this? We could provide references to methods of measuring the T-S parameters DIY, but it doesn't seem worth the effort in this case. (Both because of the perceived value of the speaker drivers, and the perceived willingness of the OP to do the work.) |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hey, i'm willing to admit i dont know what i'm doing. and i dont
doubt any of the information anyone has given me on here, i'm just practicing "learning by asking stupid questions." lol. i just want to know if i can make anything out of my ingorant assumptions or if i'm trying to think way beyond my understanding of acoustic physics. apparently it's the latter case... is there any easy way to measure the Theil Small parameters of my drivers? i've read some information on DIY Theil Small measurements and it sounds pretty complex... |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote ...
hey, i'm willing to admit i dont know what i'm doing. and i dont doubt any of the information anyone has given me on here, i'm just practicing "learning by asking stupid questions." lol. i just want to know if i can make anything out of my ingorant assumptions or if i'm trying to think way beyond my understanding of acoustic physics. apparently it's the latter case... We are saying (many of us from first-hand experience) that just building random boxes for car speakers has a very low likelyhood of success or satisfaction. is there any easy way to measure the Theil Small parameters of my drivers? Google returned 620 hits for: measuring thiele-small I'm certain that there are several good tutorials on the methodology in that list. Many serious speaker builders perform DIY T-S measurements. But you will have to decide whether your particular situation is worth the hassle. i've read some information on DIY Theil Small measurements and it sounds pretty complex... It is not trivial. That is why most manufacturers of drivers intended for conventional use will publish the numbers for your convenience. But those who make drivers for cars typically don't bother, because nobody modifies their car to fit the characteristics of the speakers. |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G" wrote in message
... In article . com, wrote: hey, i'm willing to admit i dont know what i'm doing. and i dont doubt any of the information anyone has given me on here, i'm just practicing "learning by asking stupid questions." lol. i just want to know if i can make anything out of my ingorant assumptions or if i'm trying to think way beyond my understanding of acoustic physics. apparently it's the latter case... is there any easy way to measure the Theil Small parameters of my drivers? i've read some information on DIY Theil Small measurements and it sounds pretty complex... You can buy a woofer tester. Costs about a $100. You can also measure it manually. Click on parameter on this link. http://www.kbapps.com/audio/speakerd...rs/Default.htm greg That calculator looks well thought out. If the OP doesn't have even the minimum test equipment to make these measurements, he shouldn't be thinking of building his own subwoofer, and should stick to a kit or buy one ready-made. The TS parameters worked out with this calculator will plug straight into BoxPlot and calculate the box dimensions. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Serge Auckland" wrote:
"G" wrote in message ... In article . com, wrote: hey, i'm willing to admit i dont know what i'm doing. and i dont doubt any of the information anyone has given me on here, i'm just practicing "learning by asking stupid questions." lol. i just want to know if i can make anything out of my ingorant assumptions or if i'm trying to think way beyond my understanding of acoustic physics. apparently it's the latter case... is there any easy way to measure the Theil Small parameters of my drivers? i've read some information on DIY Theil Small measurements and it sounds pretty complex... You can buy a woofer tester. Costs about a $100. You can also measure it manually. Click on parameter on this link. http://www.kbapps.com/audio/speakerd...rs/Default.htm greg That calculator looks well thought out. If the OP doesn't have even the minimum test equipment to make these measurements, he shouldn't be thinking of building his own subwoofer, and should stick to a kit or buy one ready-made. The TS parameters worked out with this calculator will plug straight into BoxPlot and calculate the box dimensions. S. This seems fairly new and is the cheapest I have seen.. http://www.parts-express.com/pe/psho...number=390-804 |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
after several hours of research, i am beginning to believe that my
drivers are in fact a pair of ACI DV12's. I know my speakers are Audio Concepts and they have dual voice coils and this seems to be the only ACI, 12 inch dvc speaker i have come across, unless anyone knows of any others. i have searched for pictures of these drivers to compare my drivers to but i cannot find anything. but if these speakers are in fact ACI DV12's i know where to obtain the theil small parameters. if there is any way anyone could help me confirm this, please let me know. almfreak |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 1:19 pm, wrote:
after several hours of research, i am beginning to believe that my drivers are in fact a pair of ACI DV12's. I know my speakers are Audio Concepts and they have dual voice coils and this seems to be the only ACI, 12 inch dvc speaker i have come across, unless anyone knows of any others. i have searched for pictures of these drivers to compare my drivers to but i cannot find anything. but if these speakers are in fact ACI DV12's i know where to obtain the theil small parameters. if there is any way anyone could help me confirm this, please let me know. almfreak As I have a new spare ACI DV12 in the box here, I can tell you it is marked in black lettering on the dual-stacked magnet: 1174894/DV12 Other characteristics are the black rubber surround, paper cone with concentric stiffening rings, and vented pole piece. |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I have a new spare ACI DV12 in the box here, I can tell you it
is marked in black lettering on the dual-stacked magnet: 1174894/DV12 Other characteristics are the black rubber surround, paper cone with concentric stiffening rings, and vented pole piece. Sounds like my driver matches all of those but the number. here are some pictures, let me know if this resembles yours. mine has the black rubber surround, paper cone with concentric rings and the vented pole piece as well. but not DV12 number!! i did in fact email ACI, but no replies yet... http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...k/Photo206.jpg http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...k/Photo207.jpg http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...k/Photo208.jpg http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...k/Photo209.jpg first pic - you can see the cone with the rubber surround and concentric stiffening rings second pic - the audio concepts sticker and ported pole piece third pic - the two stacked magnets fourth pic - the two coils are currently wired in parallel WHAT THE HECK IS THIS SPEAKER!? |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 5:27 pm, wrote:
As I have a new spare ACI DV12 in the box here, I can tell you it is marked in black lettering on the dual-stacked magnet: 1174894/DV12 Other characteristics are the black rubber surround, paper cone with concentric stiffening rings, and vented pole piece. Sounds like my driver matches all of those but the number. here are some pictures, let me know if this resembles yours. mine has the black rubber surround, paper cone with concentric rings and the vented pole piece as well. but not DV12 number!! i did in fact email ACI, but no replies yet...http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p...k/Photo209.jpg first pic - you can see the cone with the rubber surround and concentric stiffening rings second pic - the audio concepts sticker and ported pole piece third pic - the two stacked magnets fourth pic - the two coils are currently wired in parallel WHAT THE HECK IS THIS SPEAKER!? Your driver is identical physically to my DV12, still, the FS, Vas, and Qt may not be the same. If it is a DV12 you want about 2 ft3 sealed... |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Your driver is identical physically to my DV12, still, the FS, Vas, and Qt may not be the same. If it is a DV12 you want about 2 ft3 sealed... 2 cubic feet sealed? |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 8:53 pm, wrote:
Your driver is identical physically to my DV12, still, the FS, Vas, and Qt may not be the same. If it is a DV12 you want about 2 ft3 sealed... 2 cubic feet sealed? Yes 2 cubic feet sealed. This driver was used by ACI in their "Sub 1", some info: The classic Sub 1 Synthesized Bandpass (U.S. Patent #5173943) subwoofer. http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/5173943.aspx Linear frequency response from 20-90Hz, +-3db Nominal impedance 4 ohms Sensitivity: Matches satellites from 86 to 90db 1 watt/1meter Recommended RMS Power: 70 to 350 watts per channel 12" cast-frame, extended pole piece, rubber surround, down-firing Adjustment for upper-bass output to optimize system setup Internal passive low pass filters for sub 90hz 12db Internal passive high pass filters for satellites 90hz 18db 25 " tall, 13 " wide and 14 " deep (or virtually any shape that results in 1.9 cu.ft.) |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks a ton man, i appreciate the information
|
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, wrote:
well, you're right, since these woofers were given to me for free, i'm not really sure of the specs, but i did find a brand sticker on the drivers. It says "Audio Concepts" and nothing more. there is a number printed on the side of the magnet itself it reads "1172492/12147". i've searched online for quite some time trying to find any information i can on these but i can't find any such brand that sells just the speakers without a cabinet. i dont know what else to do? any ideas? Sorry to be chiming in late with this, but you can easily reach Audio Concepts at the contact info listed on their website: http://www.audioc.com It is a small company with excellent products that gives great customer service. Their website has a lot information, including pdf's of the owner's manuals for all of their speaker lines, even the discontinued products. They also used to sell speaker kits which might be how you happened to get a single woofer. I'm sure that someone there would be happy to give you the info that you need. GE |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, wrote: well, you're right, since these woofers were given to me for free, i'm not really sure of the specs, but i did find a brand sticker on the drivers. It says "Audio Concepts" and nothing more. there is a number printed on the side of the magnet itself it reads "1172492/12147". i've searched online for quite some time trying to find any information i can on these but i can't find any such brand that sells just the speakers without a cabinet. i dont know what else to do? any ideas? Sorry to be chiming in late with this, but you can easily reach Audio Concepts at the contact info listed on their website: http://www.audioc.com Yes, there is a possibility that the loudspeakers may come from some box(es) of theirs, but as the questionee pointed out the company name is not unique, contacting them will resolve whether it is one of their (oem'ed?) products. It is a small company with excellent products that gives great customer service. Their website has a lot information, including pdf's of the owner's manuals for all of their speaker lines, even the discontinued products. They also used to sell speaker kits which might be how you happened to get a single woofer. I'm sure that someone there would be happy to give you the info that you need. Just for the record, he has a pair. GE Kind regards Peter Larsen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fa jbl oak cabinets | Marketplace | |||
Q: Best amplification for diy subwoofer... subwoofer amp vs. passive+external | Tech | |||
FS: Altec VOT cabinets | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Onken Cabinets | Marketplace | |||
Need Specs for "Advent Subwoofer III" passive home subwoofer ??? | Marketplace |