[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 23, 9:55 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ooglegroups.com...

On Oct 23, 5:06 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in

On Oct 23, 4:40 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
On Oct 23, 10:08 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
ooglegroups.com...

On Oct 23, 12:25 am, "ScottW" wrote:

Now we should have a poll...who prefers off topic discussion to
off topic ridicule?

That's a false question. It implies that the OT discussion is just
naturally there, and that the ridicule is the problem,

Lol...you're such a rookie.

Go back a few years when we had knowledgeable people
who discussed audio...guys like JJ who
were relentlessly branded as Phoebe the telco witch
and tell me again that ridicule follows the OT.

If an audio post is ridiculed, it's actually on-topic, 2pid. Here's an
example:

*********************************************
Anyone see any correlations between the characterizations of Mr. Holt
and opinions posted on rao by the anti-objectivists in recent years?

Sure. The "anti-objectivists" want to advance sound quality.

Why "advance" sound quality when everything already sounds the same?
We've hit the wall: 16-bit CDs, QSC amps and wire from Home Depot.
Audio nirvana, no sound advancement required.

So what are you bitching about?

Talk about watering down and sweetening your ridicule
to soda pop level.

This poster hasn't earned the type of response that you have, 2pid.
He'd have to post stupidity for months and months and months to even
begin to catch up with you and good old Arns.

So if he conforms to your opinion he can avoid increasingly vile ridicule.

The dilemma he created has nothing to do with 'opinion', 2pid. Logic
is funny that way. So yes, if this poster, like you, continued to
argue that obvious facts are wrong, he would get ridicule.

If your arrogance was only matched by your intellect.

Always consider...what if you're wrong? As a human, you're as
capable of error as any of us. You are human, aren't you?

Sure I am. Now you can show me the error in the logic, and we can get
it over with. So lay it out, 2pid: where is the error?

Wow...what a disgusting admission.

What do you have against logic? LOL!

Nothing...the distorted perception of having mastered it
is the problem.

As I thought: Nothing here but flatulence.