OK. I get it. If I don't hear any distortion it passes the test. Wow, I
had it all wrong. I thought that there was some objective verifiable
criteria. Now I can buy a $199 Kenwood receiver and be happy.
And all those kids who drive those boom cars have great equipment because
they don't hear any distortion.
This new subjective approach sounds great. Got to stop now; it's time to
got listen to some expensive cables.

Wylie Williams

"Bob Marcus" wrote in message
news:CJpbc.62676$w54.390067@attbi_s01...
RBernst929 wrote:

I'll try this one more time, for those of you in the "there is no
difference"
school of amplifier design.

Who would that be?

Take one person's system at home. Replace just
the amplifier with different types. Listen. See if everyone agrees that
the
resulting sound is identical, especially to the person's who owns and is
familiar with the system. If all amplifiers are "technically perfect"
since
1950, there should be NO difference AT ALL in the sound. But, if there
IS
a
difference, whether it is qualifiable as to type (ie: more treble, less
bass)
or whatever, then "all amplifiers sound the same" is wrong. -Bob
Bernstein.

No one's ever said that all amplifiers sound the same. Ever.

As for your little experiment, it's about as meaningful as pointing to the
sun rising in the east as proof that it revolves around the earth.

bob

__________________________________________________ _______________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy...n.asp?cid=3963