Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any advice on spending another $1k or so?
RNP and RNC plus a decent small condenser? Other processor? Otari MX5050 MkIV-4 ½" Four Track to P.A.R.I.S. Pro 16 Channel / 24bit 8in/out. A&H GL2 4-buss. TL Audio C1 (grey range) Dual PreAmp/Comp Lexicon 110 24bit (1) U67 (1) EV RE20 (1) MD 421 (1) SM 57 Equi-Tech Balanced Power AKG 240 Headphones JBL 4311s Event 20/20bas Thanks for your time. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
Any advice on spending another $1k or so? RNP and RNC plus a decent small condenser? Other processor? RNP, and then do some work to figure out what you need next. Otari MX5050 MkIV Four Track to P.A.R.I.S. Pro 16 Channel / 24bit 8in/out. A&H GL2 4-buss. TL Audio C1 (grey range) Dual PreAmp/Comp Lexicon 110 24bit (1) U67 (1) EV RE20 (1) MD 421 (1) SM 57 Equi-Tech Balanced Power AKG 240 Headphones JBL 4311s Event 20/20bas Thanks for your time. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want to spend another $1k and improve things, buy an Oktava MC012
(from www.oktava.com , please, not one of the junkers sold elsewhere) with the 3 capsules (I find myself using the hypercardioid the most), then spend the rest of the money on room treatment. Peace, Paul |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 11:13 pm, "Paul Stamler" wrote:
If you want to spend another $1k and improve things, buy an Oktava MC012 (fromwww.oktava.com, please, not one of the junkers sold elsewhere) with the 3 capsules (I find myself using the hypercardioid the most), then spend the rest of the money on room treatment. Peace, Paul Will someone please tell me why the "elsewhere" Oktavas are not as good if they are indeed made at the same place as the others? I looked inside of mine (all be they old ones) and they look pretty damned good - I think I bought mine through GC |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 2:45 am, Danny T wrote:
Will someone please tell me why the "elsewhere" Oktavas are not as good if they are indeed made at the same place as the others? I looked inside of mine (all be they old ones) and they look pretty damned good - I think I bought mine through GC I don't know what the situation is like today, but 5 years or so ago, there were several sources for distribution of the mics, and it seems that different distributors offered mics with different levels of quality control. At the time, there was a US distributor who did their own QC and only sold mics that met their standards. Guitar Center made a deal for a large quantity of mics which seemed to have random quality. Some were fine, some weren't, and most of GC's customers didn't know the difference - it was a condenser mic that they could afford and that was all that mattered. Today, octava.com is the US source for thoroughly inspected and tested mics. With others, you take your chances. If you can do your own testing and have a right to return mics that you don't like, you can save some money that way. Otherwise, it's better to buy from a dependable source and be sure that you don't have reason to doubt your purchase. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 8:20 am, Mike Rivers (that's me!)
wrote: At the time, there was a US distributor who did their own QC and only sold mics that met their standards. Sorry, I just blanked out on the name, The Sound Room, which is still in existence and still headed up by Taylor Johnson, the original owner (though he's now living in Argentina as far as I know). They're now on line as oktava.com. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
On Oct 16, 11:13 pm, "Paul Stamler" wrote: If you want to spend another $1k and improve things, buy an Oktava MC012 (fromwww.oktava.com, please, not one of the junkers sold elsewhere) with the 3 capsules (I find myself using the hypercardioid the most), then spend the rest of the money on room treatment. Will someone please tell me why the "elsewhere" Oktavas are not as good if they are indeed made at the same place as the others? I looked inside of mine (all be they old ones) and they look pretty damned good - I think I bought mine through GC The Chinese-made Oktavas have excellent copies of the electronics. In fact, the PC board material they use is a lot better than the Russian material and the caps they use are more reliable. HOWEVER, the Chinese-made Oktavas have just godawful capsules. Really, really shameful. Since the main sonic bottleneck in ANY microphone is the capsule, this is critical. Also, the brass they use is even worse quality than the Russian stuff so it's even easier to goober up the threads. GC sold microphones that they got from A&S McKay. For many years, McKay sold stuff from the Russian factory in Tula, and only for a short period of time was McKay flogging the Chinese crap. So it depends on when you bought them. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On Oct 17, 8:20 am, Mike Rivers (that's me!) wrote: At the time, there was a US distributor who did their own QC and only sold mics that met their standards. Sorry, I just blanked out on the name, The Sound Room, which is still in existence and still headed up by Taylor Johnson, the original owner (though he's now living in Argentina as far as I know). They're now on line as oktava.com. Actually, Taylor has sold the business to some Polish folks who have a good relationship with the Tula factory, and it's being operated as a family business. They are good folks, and Taylor is maintaining a good working relationship with them. He sold the business only so he could devote more time to THE Microphones. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 5:20 am, Mike Rivers wrote:
On Oct 17, 2:45 am, Danny T wrote: Will someone please tell me why the "elsewhere" Oktavas are not as good if they are indeed made at the same place as the others? I looked inside of mine (all be they old ones) and they look pretty damned good - I think I bought mine through GC I don't know what the situation is like today, but 5 years or so ago, there were several sources for distribution of the mics, and it seems that different distributors offered mics with different levels of quality control. At the time, there was a US distributor who did their own QC and only sold mics that met their standards. Guitar Center made a deal for a large quantity of mics which seemed to have random quality. Some were fine, some weren't, and most of GC's customers didn't know the difference - it was a condenser mic that they could afford and that was all that mattered. Today, octava.com is the US source for thoroughly inspected and tested mics. With others, you take your chances. If you can do your own testing and have a right to return mics that you don't like, you can save some money that way. Otherwise, it's better to buy from a dependable source and be sure that you don't have reason to doubt your purchase. That makes sense. Thanks for that. - I bought mine a long time before that so I guess I got lucky then |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 5:42 am, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Danny T wrote: On Oct 16, 11:13 pm, "Paul Stamler" wrote: If you want to spend another $1k and improve things, buy an Oktava MC012 (fromwww.oktava.com, please, not one of the junkers sold elsewhere) with the 3 capsules (I find myself using the hypercardioid the most), then spend the rest of the money on room treatment. Will someone please tell me why the "elsewhere" Oktavas are not as good if they are indeed made at the same place as the others? I looked inside of mine (all be they old ones) and they look pretty damned good - I think I bought mine through GC The Chinese-made Oktavas have excellent copies of the electronics. In fact, the PC board material they use is a lot better than the Russian material and the caps they use are more reliable. HOWEVER, the Chinese-made Oktavas have just godawful capsules. Really, really shameful. Since the main sonic bottleneck in ANY microphone is the capsule, this is critical. Also, the brass they use is even worse quality than the Russian stuff so it's even easier to goober up the threads. GC sold microphones that they got from A&S McKay. For many years, McKay sold stuff from the Russian factory in Tula, and only for a short period of time was McKay flogging the Chinese crap. So it depends on when you bought them. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." thanks scott. I figured it was something like that and mike said pretty much the same thing. I don't even remember when I bought mine it was so long ago. I was thinking of buying another pair, which is why I was wondering. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
thanks scott. I figured it was something like that and mike said pretty much the same thing. I don't even remember when I bought mine it was so long ago. I was thinking of buying another pair, which is why I was wondering. Buy it from the Sound Room or from Oktava USA and you'll be fine. Both companies are charging more than GC was, but the quality control is a lot better than the mikes GC was selling too. You will not encounter the Chinese forgeries if you buy from a legitimate supplier, but I would definitely not touch Oktava mikes on Ebay because there are some of them floating around out there. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Home studio acoustics: Rock or hard place? | Pro Audio | |||
Reel to Reel Collection....Rock...Calssical....Folk | Tech | |||
Reel to Reel Collection...Rock...Classical...Folk | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Studio processors and other studio stuff! | Marketplace |