Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 10, 11:25 am, wrote:
I have a pair of NT2's (about 12 years old), that I use for recording large ensembles. I tried the NT1's for the same application and the NT2's were considerably better. I don't know if the products today are similar. The NT2's have also been pretty durable... one fell from a 14' mic stand (wind) and broke into 3 pieces - I snapped it back together and it continues to work perfectly. In rec.audio.pro adam79 wrote: : Hey, I'm thinking of buying either a Rode NT-1 or NT-2 and the NT-5. The : NT-1 or NT-2 would be for vocals and micing the acoustic guitar, but the : hole, and the NT-5 for placement by the neck. The NT-2 is $150 more than : the NT-2.. is it really worth that extra $150? The only thing I have ever really like the NT1 on is an acoustic guitar, and that I love. ( a foot out and pointing at the 12th) Its a cheap attitude mic and if an in your face acoustic dred sound is what you're after its a good choice. IMHO |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB RODE NT3 | Pro Audio | |||
Was Rode NT5 and Rode NT2 moisture problems... | Pro Audio | |||
Rode K2 | Pro Audio | |||
Rode K2 | Pro Audio | |||
WTB: RODE NT-5 Mic | Pro Audio |