Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,alt.music.home-studio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 10:18 am, (Don Pearce) wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:30:52 -0700, wrote: I designed them back in 1995. The NT-2 and 1 used the same circuits and parts until Rode cut costs on them. They later went to surface mount which IMO degraded the sound significantly by also lowering manufacturing costs. Are you serious? You degrade sound significantly by lowering manufacturing costs? Suppose you asked Sting to cut out the circuit boards for you at, say $10,000 a time. The mic would now sound much better on account of the increased manufacturing cost, yes? But you did at least add IMO there, which I suppose is something. No, you don't degrade sound with surface mount components either - that is just a crock of religion. If anything you might improve things because of the lower susceptibility to interference. d -- Pearce Consultinghttp://www.pearce.uk.com Lets not get silly here. I wouldn't let stink anywhere near my gear. He doesn't like to bath and he smells enough to stink up an entire control room. It's common for the bean counters that really run things to demand manufacturing cost be cut. Surface mount parts are cheaper than the discrete TO-92 transistors and Wima film and foil polypropylene caps originally used. You can't even buy the transistors I use in surface mount. I suppose I could "sub" some surface mount transistors, but the noise floor would rise. Of course, higher noise is not in the realm of quality of sound but is it important to you? The Wimas ran about 30 cents compared to the 3 cents for the mono ceramic caps now used. That's a 10 to 1 reduction in costs for just those parts. Greed trumps quality as it always has. Interference in a screened metal mic body is not a factor here. It's not rf circuits with impedance controlled traces, etc. Surface mount parts offer no benefit other than cost reduction. Any audio designer with any hearing left can hear the difference between a monolythic ceramic cap and a precision polypropylene or polystyrene film cap, you may not think it matters but many would disagree with you. All my designs use through hole precision metal film resistors and big ass film caps. I design for quality of sound, I leave the rest to Behringer and friends. Try this experiment if you don't believe me. Replace the quality film cap off one of your nice German mics with a ceramic cap. Listen. Now replace it with a very good film cap. That's a great test for a cap as the signal levels are very low and the entire sound has to pass through it. Jim Williams Audio Upgrades |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB RODE NT3 | Pro Audio | |||
Was Rode NT5 and Rode NT2 moisture problems... | Pro Audio | |||
Rode K2 | Pro Audio | |||
Rode K2 | Pro Audio | |||
WTB: RODE NT-5 Mic | Pro Audio |