Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.video.desktop,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.digital,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Pearce wrote:
Look, it doesn't matter if the black is at the top or the bottom of the signal, it will have exactly the same amount of noise on it. Likewise the white. Consider... when black is being transmitted, the r-f power radiated by a TV station is greater than when white is being transmitted. Therefore the field strength produced at a receiving antenna is higher for black than white, and a given value of r-f noise will be a lesser percentage of the received signal during transmission of black then white. In other words, black (and sync, which is blacker than black) will have a higher signal-to-noise ratio. However noise voltage tends to drive the detected video waveform about as far in negative polarity as it does positive. Therefore the average change in light output from the display (CRT, etc) across a complete cycle of noise energy can be close to zero, at a normal viewing distance. This effect is lost, though, for noise on low luminance video, because the negative-going noise pulses can extend below reference black where the display cannot fully show them, whereas the opposite noise polarity will be fully shown at that luminance level. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted Video | Tech | |||
Why is video inverted for transmission? | Tech | |||
Why is video inverted for transmission? | Tech | |||
Why is video inverted for transmission? | Tech | |||
Why is video inverted for transmission? | Tech |