Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Steven Sullivan Steven Sullivan is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,268
Default New AVR Receivers

JimC wrote:
JimC wrote:
I have previously inquired about receivers or pre/processors that would
be good performers in a system with both audio (stereo and SACD
surround) and HD video. It was suggested that it would be some time
before receivers and/or pre/pros would incoporate or be compatible with
all the most desirable HDTV and SACD features/codexes. In other words,
those units intended primarily for video didn't include features I would
want for SACD surround, (such as adjustable bass management for
front/surround/center channels, good level matching from multiple
positions, etc.). Also, few "audio-centered" units seemed to include all
the possible video functions one might want in the future, such as HDMI
1.3, etc. - Since I don't upgrade very often (new electronics maybe
every 10 - 15 years), it didn't see, to make sense for me to replace my
existing system with one that lack features I may want in the next few
years, despite that fact that some of those features won't be in general
use soon (e.g., HDMI 1.3, deep color, etc.).

Recently, however, some new receivers coming on the market seem to
include lots of such capabilities and features.-----------


As understood (correct me if I'm wrong), SACD audio can be processed,
(with bass management and room equalization functionality) in the newer
receivers and pre/pros, provided both the SACD player and AVR receiver
or pre-pro are HDMI 1.2 or 1.3 compatible.


HDMI 1.2 and up offer the option of passing DSD digitally.
SACD's native sample rate is more than 2 MHz. More than
likely,any receiver that can process SACD will convert it to a more manageable
rate as PCM...say, 88.2 kHz/24bit.

Has anyone had experience
with such systems, and does anyone have an opinion as to the quality of
the resulting SACD audio? Would the equalization systems (e.g., the
Audyssey MultEQ system) utilized in some of the new receivers work with
SACD inputs in HDMI 1.3 format, and would the results be as good as I
get with line-level analog signals fed through an ICBM? (One current
problem being that not many SACD players are HDMI 1.2 or 1.3 compatible).


ilink (and Denonlink) could pass decoded DSD digitally to receivers,
and have been around for several years. In all cases I know of,
if any digital processing is done to the signal, it is converted
to PCM first.

More recently, HDMI 1.1 could pass a DSD--PCM conversion in the player,
digitally.

I would not expect either of these to be inferior to the ICBM, on the
contrary, keeping the signal digital allows delay and bass management
and room EQ and other DSP like Dolby Pro Logic to be applied more
consistently.

___
-S
"As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fa various,amp,receivers etc hydebee Vacuum Tubes 3 April 27th 07 03:42 AM
HT Receivers [email protected] Audio Opinions 9 August 8th 05 09:24 PM
Q on AV/Stereo Receivers GW Tech 2 December 27th 04 08:40 AM
FS Onkyo 919 with remote, manuals and original reciept-Onkyo 919THX Receiver Phil Marketplace 0 September 23rd 03 03:05 AM
6.1, 7.1 channels AV receivers... Jim General 1 July 9th 03 03:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"