Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.misc,rec.audio.tech,uk.rec.audio
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Eeyore
writes Arny Krueger wrote: "Eeyore" wrote You can in fact very easily have a 'hum loop' like that *inside* a piece of equipment. I've measured potential differences of the order of tens of uV between different parts of a steel chassis caused by electromagnetic induction from the stray field of a large power transformer inside the equipment for example. That's one reason why we have separate signal grounds, even inside the chassis. This used to be very popular but is inherently incompatible with good EMC practice. I use chassis ground as my reference and I'm VERY careful about stuffing current into the ground ( i.e I avoid it like the plague ). As a last resort, I also make some internal connections differential/balanced, which of course entirely eliminates the complication of questionable ground potentials. Graham I have to agree there Graham. If you're going to have a ground in a piece of equipment, make sure there's only one, and make sure that everything that connects to it has the lowest impedance path you can manage. -- Chris Morriss |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audio Mixer | General | |||
Audio Mixer | Pro Audio | |||
FS Mackie Audio mixer 24/8 | Marketplace | |||
true 3D audio mixer? (or virtual mixer) | Pro Audio | |||
FS: BM-250 broadcast audio mixer | Marketplace |