Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Taiyo Yuden vs. Generic Brands vs. Verbatim. If you are making a cd-r audio disc, and you want maximum audio reproduction quality, and less error rates, do you buy/use a more expensive cd-r disc ? And does burning at 8 to 16x (vs. higher speeds) affect sound quality and error rates as well (especially when cd-r is to be played on a car stereo) ? I'm confused because I've found little concensus on these matters. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taiyo Yuden vs. Generic Brands vs. Verbatim. If you are making a cd-r audio
disc, and you want maximum audio reproduction quality, and less error rates, do you buy/use a more expensive cd-r disc ? In my own limited experience, it does seem to be worthwhile to buy and use discs made by the "first-tier" manufacturers, if I'm concerned about playability and compatibility and longevity of the discs I burn. Taiyo Yuden, Mitsui, and HHB seem to have a very good reputation among professionals. I used to strongly favor TDK's "Certified Plus" metallized-cyanine discs, but they seem to have stopped making these several years ago and started OEMing their discs from Ritek and other generic suppliers, alas. My experience with discs by the second- and third-tier manufacturers has been mixed. Some of them seem to work fine. Others don't work out well, with a significant number of CD players having difficulty tracking the discs or playing them back reliably. Some aren't worth the powder needed to blow 'em to hell. Price is not necessarily a good indication of quality. Neither is brand name (at least, not when it comes to high-visibility consumer brand names) since many of the brand companies seem to switch manufacturers and disc types frequently, and it's near-impossible to predict what you're actually getting without buying and testing. And does burning at 8 to 16x (vs. higher speeds) affect sound quality and error rates as well (especially when cd-r is to be played on a car stereo) Well, I think that the answer is "It depends". As I understand it, there's a significant physical difference between discs designed to be burned at low speed (with a relatively long laser exposure) and those optimized for high-speed burning (where the laser can't "burn" any given spot on the disc for very long). The high-speed disc formulas use a dye layer which is more sensitive to the laser... and I believe that it may therefore be both somewhat thinner, and more photo-sensitive. I've noticed a tendency for the high-speed discs to be somewhat more difficult to play back reliably, especially in older CD players, and I infer that the high-speed- capable dye layer may not deliver as strongly-modulated a reflection during playback and thus may be more difficult to track and have a higher bit-error rate. So, for greatest playback compatibility, I prefer to use discs which have a lower maximum-speed rating (say, 1-8x or 1-12x). I've read opinions that many dye types deliver their best results when burned at an intermediate speed - not at their maximum rating, but not at the lowest speeds either. Disc wobble and vibration may be more of a problem when burning at the maximum-possible speed... and if the drive doing the burning can't follow the disc's wobbling and vibrating surface well enough to keep the beam moving smoothly along the wobble-track, then the resulting disc is likely to be hard to play back well. As far as the track goes, there's another issue to be considered: is the disc a fully-conformant (74-minute) blank, or one which skates right up against the edge of the Red/Orange Book standards in order to pack in more capacity (80-minute blanks). I believe that there's plenty of good reason to want to stick with real 74-minute blanks unless you really need the additional capacity - they're significantly easier for many CD players to track, especially at the outer edge. So, my advice is: - For casual applications, find a brand of generic discs which works acceptably in your burner. - For archiving, or for creating audio CDs that you want to "just work, first time, every time", buy first-tier 74-minute blanks and burn them at moderate speeds. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Musicfan 97" wrote ...
Taiyo Yuden vs. Generic Brands vs. Verbatim. If you are making a cd-r audio disc, and you want maximum audio reproduction quality, and less error rates, do you buy/use a more expensive cd-r disc ? In the case of CDs, "maximum quality" and "lowerst error rates" are two names for the same thing. Other than digital errors, there are NO differenes in "audio quality". But that is not to say that all discs are created equal. After bad experiences with both CDR and DVDR discs of various labels, IMHO, it is easily worth the few extra pennies to get a known top quality disc like Taiyo-Yuden. Certainly when making discs for others, minimizing the failure/return rate is worth far more than the slight extra cost. Beware that you buy T-Y from a reputable dealer as there are counterfeit discs out there. Beware also of the "brands" that just buy OEM discs from the cheapest vendor of the month. You never know what you are really getting. Recommended: http://www.digitalfaq.com It says that "Verbatim" label (in Europe) are OEMed from Taiyo-Yuden. At least when that web page was last updated. And does burning at 8 to 16x (vs. higher speeds) affect sound quality and error rates as well (especially when cd-r is to be played on a car stereo) Yes. And the writer drive plays a role also. You can get software for certain brands of drives that will go back and read the discs and show you the error rate. I stick with Taiyo-Yuden discs for both CDR and DVDR, and Lite-On (or Sony which are often OEMed by Lite-On) burner drives. I have a very low failure/return rate. I burn video DVDR at ~4x and audio CDR at 12~16x. Likely others will have their own combinations that work well for them. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Musicfan 97" wrote ... Taiyo Yuden vs. Generic Brands vs. Verbatim. If you are making a cd-r audio disc, and you want maximum audio reproduction quality, and less error rates, do you buy/use a more expensive cd-r disc ? In the case of CDs, "maximum quality" and "lowerst error rates" are two names for the same thing. Other than digital errors, there are NO differenes in "audio quality". But that is not to say that all discs are created equal. After bad experiences with both CDR and DVDR discs of various labels, IMHO, it is easily worth the few extra pennies to get a known top quality disc like Taiyo-Yuden. Certainly when making discs for others, minimizing the failure/return rate is worth far more than the slight extra cost. Beware that you buy T-Y from a reputable dealer as there are counterfeit discs out there. Beware also of the "brands" that just buy OEM discs from the cheapest vendor of the month. You never know what you are really getting. Recommended: http://www.digitalfaq.com It says that "Verbatim" label (in Europe) are OEMed from Taiyo-Yuden. At least when that web page was last updated. And does burning at 8 to 16x (vs. higher speeds) affect sound quality and error rates as well (especially when cd-r is to be played on a car stereo) Yes. And the writer drive plays a role also. You can get software for certain brands of drives that will go back and read the discs and show you the error rate. I stick with Taiyo-Yuden discs for both CDR and DVDR, and Lite-On (or Sony which are often OEMed by Lite-On) burner drives. I have a very low failure/return rate. I burn video DVDR at ~4x and audio CDR at 12~16x. Likely others will have their own combinations that work well for them. Agree about the Taiyo Yuiden discs, but I'm lucky to get 12 months from a Lite On burner, and the last Lite On I had wouldn't recognise Fujifilm DVDRW discs. I'm now using a Pioneer burner and so far the results are good. Always burn audio CD's at no more than 12x. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Awesome, clear, technical responses... much appreciated ! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
burn speed | Pro Audio | |||
Speech Quality Burn | Pro Audio | |||
How to burn to disc? | Tech | |||
How Do I Check The Quality of My CD Burn? | Pro Audio | |||
CD blank quality | Audio Opinions |