Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
chris
 
Posts: n/a
Default I cant believe you said that

large snip

NO! To get better than 95% probability that it's not random chance,
the required percentage correct drops as the number of trials
increases, so that while you need 9 out of 10, you only need 15 out

of
20, and this reduces to not much more than 500 out of 1,000 (for the
real obsessives!).

Yes, it's been pointed out that it should be 15 out of 20, not 16,

for
better than 95% confidence. That's fine, rules changed accordingly.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering


I cant believe you just said that : 500 out of a 1000 is proof
positive with a 95% confidence level.

to any normal person with even basic O level maths, its 50%, random
chance.
We all did the silly dice throwing and looked at the results when we
were at school.
Later re-examined in college stat's class, it was still 50:50.

Unless your current job is Advisor in Mathematics to the New Labour
Education department. or the Treasury -- Its the only rational
explanation.

I suppose anyone doing your test that scored 6 out of 7; is still
random chance with a 35% uncertainty.

  #2   Report Post  
S888Wheel
 
Posts: n/a
Default I cant believe you said that

I cant believe you just said that : 500 out of a 1000 is proof
positive with a 95% confidence level.


He didn't. He said not much more than 500 which is more than 500 just not much.
He is quite right. Small percentages in difference mean a great deal with large
enough samples.

  #3   Report Post  
Stewart Pinkerton
 
Posts: n/a
Default I cant believe you said that

On 15 Jan 2004 00:01:13 GMT, "chris"
wrote:

large snip

NO! To get better than 95% probability that it's not random chance,
the required percentage correct drops as the number of trials
increases, so that while you need 9 out of 10, you only need 15 out

of
20, and this reduces to not much more than 500 out of 1,000 (for the
real obsessives!).

Yes, it's been pointed out that it should be 15 out of 20, not 16,

for
better than 95% confidence. That's fine, rules changed accordingly.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering


I cant believe you just said that : 500 out of a 1000 is proof
positive with a 95% confidence level.


Your disbelief is well founded - I did not say that. Read it again.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"