Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" said: "Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" said: A modern stereo receiver costing as little as $80 would put most of them to shame. Prove it by showing us the results of the DBT that led to this claim. Did I say that the opinion above was the result of a listening test? ;-) Thanks Arns for admitting you're just another one of those blowhards who refuse to substantiate their claims with scientifical evidence. Thanks Sander for admitting that you are completely unfamiliar with the use of test equipment to evaluate audio gear. ;-) Please show me the URL with the results of your measurements. You can find my measurements at www.pcavtech.com . Don't think I posted any results of my tests of stereo receivers. Thanks for admitting you can't substantiate your claim. Thanks Sander for showing your shallow thinking by effectively saying that posting results on the web somehow validates them. Here's a helpful hint: Posting results on the web in no way validates them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Marantz 140 Question | Tech | |||
FA:Marantz 2226B receiver Vintage | Marketplace | |||
FA:Vintage Marantz 2226B receiver | Marketplace | |||
FA: Marantz 2226B Receiver | Marketplace | |||
FA: Marantz 2226B Receiver | Marketplace |