Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an audience recording of mine (Zoom H4 with AT853 mics) I have (using
Cool Edit) a difference between positive and negative peaks (negative greater than positive). What is the cause and how can be corrected? Thanks Marco -- [cut off the capital B to reply] |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "MarcoM" wrote in message ... In an audience recording of mine (Zoom H4 with AT853 mics) I have (using Cool Edit) a difference between positive and negative peaks (negative greater than positive). What is the cause and how can be corrected? Thanks Marco Real life is the cause. That is how sound pressure waves in the air hit the mic element and modulate it. It does not need correction. peace dawg |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MarcoM wrote in news:VkHZh.22629$uJ5.411306
@twister2.libero.it: In an audience recording of mine (Zoom H4 with AT853 mics) I have (using Cool Edit) a difference between positive and negative peaks (negative greater than positive). What is the cause and how can be corrected? That's natural and you don't correct it. Many instruments, brass in particular, have asymetrical wave forms. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carey Carlan, 01/05/2007 15.52:
That's natural and you don't correct it. Many instruments, brass in particular, have asymetrical wave forms. Yes, it's ok for me, the sound is good. But most of the live recordings I (and not only I) made have more similarity between positive and negative peaks. I made a test, now: I set the controls in a lower value and now the difference is gone. Probably the difference can indicate a clipping? Marco -- [cut off the capital B to reply] |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 9:33 am, MarcoM wrote:
In an audience recording of mine (Zoom H4 with AT853 mics) I have (using Cool Edit) a difference between positive and negative peaks (negative greater than positive). What is the cause and how can be corrected? Sometimes that's natural, but it's possible that there's a design defect in the recorder. Try it under a controlled condition. In a fairly dead room, record a few distinct hand claps a foot or two away from the mics. Take a look at that waveform. It should be composed of predominantly positive-going spikes. If so, then your recorder is fine and you're seeing a natural affect of room reflections. If they're predominantly negative-going, then your recorder is build backwards. Often the acoustic polarity doesn't matter, but sometimes it does. Since you're looking at waveforms, you obviously have a DAW of some sort. Try inverting the polarity of the waveform and listen to the playback. If it sounds better, save it that way. If not, don't worry about it. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers, 01/05/2007 16.31:
Sometimes that's natural, but it's possible that there's a design defect in the recorder. Try it under a controlled condition. In a fairly dead room, record a few distinct hand claps a foot or two away from the mics. Take a look at that waveform. It should be composed of predominantly positive-going spikes. If so, then your recorder is fine and you're seeing a natural affect of room reflections. If they're predominantly negative-going, then your recorder is build backwards. The positive spikes seem to be lightly predominant, recording some claps in my bedroom (not a perfect dead room...). Often the acoustic polarity doesn't matter, but sometimes it does. Since you're looking at waveforms, you obviously have a DAW of some sort. Try inverting the polarity of the waveform and listen to the playback. If it sounds better, save it that way. If not, don't worry about it. I try to listen to an inverted sample from my last recording, it seems to be very difficult to hear differences between the original and the inverted track. Thanks for your help, it was explained in easy way for my not-professional experience, so my recorder seems to work correctly. Marco -- [cut off the capital B to reply] |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 May 2007 09:33:41 -0400, MarcoM wrote
(in article ): In an audience recording of mine (Zoom H4 with AT853 mics) I have (using Cool Edit) a difference between positive and negative peaks (negative greater than positive). What is the cause and how can be corrected? Thanks Marco Don't sweat it. Humans are asymetrical by nature; some have higher positive peaks, some more negative. I have higher negative peaks (provided I'm recorded pin 2 hot). Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Waveform search | Pro Audio | |||
Could someone explains the following WaveForm Picture? | Pro Audio | |||
CD Waveform | Pro Audio | |||
adjust entire waveform | Tech | |||
Help: Plugin that "searches" for specific waveform. | Tech |