Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
MiNe 109 wrote: In article .com, ScottW wrote: On Apr 23, 5:07Β*pm, MiNe 109 wrote: In article et, Β*Jenn wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Musi....ap/index.html High fidelity takes backseat to portability POSTED: 1:50 p.m. EDT, April 23, 2007 Story Highlights ¬ MP3 players now preferred means of listening to music ¬ Stereo system, CD sales way down ¬ Some audiophiles unhappy, but most people like MP3 devices SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- Music lovers remember a familiar advertising image from the past: a man reclined in a chair, head back, blown away by music from his high-fidelity sound system. Like the Marlboro Man before him, Maxell's pitchman is now a relic. With their ability to store vast libraries of music in your pocket, sleek digital music players have replaced bulky home stereo systems as the music gear of choice. But the sound quality of digital audio files is noticeably inferior to that of compact discs and even vinyl. Are these the final days of hi-fi sound? Judging by the 2 billion songs downloaded from Apple Inc.'s iTunes service, the ubiquity of white iPod "ear buds," and the hundreds of thousands of folks file-sharing for free, the answer is yes. "In many ways, good enough (sound quality) is fine," said Paul Connolly, an art installation specialist and longtime audiophile from Sugar Land, Texas, who's now in the process of digitizing his 2,400 CD collection in Apple's lossless digital audio format. "The warmth and the nice distortion that the album had was beautiful," he said. "But do I long for the days of albums? No. Do I long for the days of CDs now that we've gone digital? No. It's a medium." snip "I honestly can't really tell the difference between CD, tape and digital," [MacFarlane] said. "I'd even accept a lower quality as long as it's digital and portable." "Good enough!" the audiophile rallying cry. There's something in there about music becoming less valued as the quality goes down and the accessibility goes up. Still, things always change, and who loves last year's cell phone? On the other hand, I heard a trombone recital that included Arthur Pryor arrangements played on a narrow-bore instrument from the twenties. I drove my seventies Volvo to work the other day and you'd have thought I pulled up in a Model T given the reaction. That wasn't it. A Model T is collectors item. Nothing collectible about your car. "In a museum" is part of the exact quote. Did you really think I was implying my beat up 140 is a collector's item? You'd get the same response from a 70's era suitcase cell phone. I'll bet there'd be quite a reaction as the first cell phone service I know about was in the eighties. People were just shocked you bothered to maintain an absolute POS like a 70's era Volvo. Wow. Any excuse to put me down. Wierd, huh? The 140/240 series was not only commercially successful, but pioneered safety and environmental features as well as enjoying longevity domestic cars didn't have. When your seventies ride turns over 380,000 miles we can compare notes on which is the POS. Stephen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A blast from the past... | Audio Opinions | |||
best of for past years | Car Audio | |||
Voices from the Past | Pro Audio | |||
Inters and getting past an interveiw | Pro Audio | |||
Voices from the past | Tech |