Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wylie Williams" wrote in message
I have heard many speakers that had peaky or ill controlled bass that were considered more satisfying than similar size speakers with tighter bass, even though tight bass is more technically correct. "Tight bass" has no technical meaning. Most people call bass "tight" when its overdamped and/or under-developed. At worst it's just another word no light or no-bass. If you want a specification as to what would be necessary to reproduce bass content with every modern recording at full level with no compression, no dynamic power compression and no bandwidth limitations I'd say that Holman's recommendation of 122 dB SPL might cover all the bases. So @ 2 meters that means 116 dB 12 to 62 Hz (the bandwidth takes in account the bandwidth of modern programs (www.svsubwoofers.com)) means that you should be able to replay most avaiable recordings at a fully realistic level. Check out the June 1999 Sound & Vision for pictures of a system that meets this criteria, I personally know (and have recorded performance) of 3 systems that meet this criterion in the US. |