[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

paul packer wrote:
On 3 Jan 2007 03:48:11 -0800, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:


George M. Middius a scris:
Sander deWaal said:

from ro-MANIA

I hope you enjoy your new home!

Predictable choice for Sacky...

http://www.answers.com/topic/same-se...age-in-romania

"The primary LGBT rights in Romania, ACCEPT, has advocated for partnership
rights for same sex couples as well as for same-sex marriage in Romania.
The organisation launched a campaign to legalise same-sex unions in
Romania during the Bucharest GayFest 2006, which lasted from 30 May to 4
June, and was organised under the theme of "Same-sex marriage and civil
unions in Romania". This event provoked widespread debate over the issue
in the media. LGBT activists from ACCEPT organised a public debate and
seminar on same-sex unions on May 31, and called on the government to
provide marriage or at least registered partnership for same-sex couples,
offering its assistance in forming a legislative proposal.[1] So far, the
government has not responded."

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/inde...m/itemID/14203

"Romania had the lowest level of backing [in the EU] for same-sex marriage
at 11 per cent, with Latvia at 12 per cent, Cyprus at 14 per cent, and
Greece and Bulgaria at 15 per cent each."


"at least" you won't be following me over here.
just as well, for a country with such good looking women,
the guys look quite pedestrian.

And how do you explain that genetically, Art? I'm sure a geneticist
would tell you you must need glasses.

Whatever the genetic reason, he's telling the truth.

[paul packer]

On 3 Jan 2007 21:30:42 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


"at least" you won't be following me over here.
just as well, for a country with such good looking women,
the guys look quite pedestrian.

And how do you explain that genetically, Art? I'm sure a geneticist
would tell you you must need glasses.

Whatever the genetic reason, he's telling the truth.

Perhaps the place should be studied. There may be something there that
scientists need to know about.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

paul packer wrote:
On 3 Jan 2007 21:30:42 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


"at least" you won't be following me over here.
just as well, for a country with such good looking women,
the guys look quite pedestrian.

And how do you explain that genetically, Art? I'm sure a geneticist
would tell you you must need glasses.

Whatever the genetic reason, he's telling the truth.

Perhaps the place should be studied. There may be something there that
scientists need to know about.

I'll bet scientists study there all the time, but keep the results
quiet...

[paul packer]

On 4 Jan 2007 03:07:54 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


paul packer wrote:
On 3 Jan 2007 21:30:42 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


"at least" you won't be following me over here.
just as well, for a country with such good looking women,
the guys look quite pedestrian.

And how do you explain that genetically, Art? I'm sure a geneticist
would tell you you must need glasses.

Whatever the genetic reason, he's telling the truth.

Perhaps the place should be studied. There may be something there that
scientists need to know about.

I'll bet scientists study there all the time, but keep the results
quiet...


Here I post a sensible scientific suggestion and you trivialise it
with innuendo. :-)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

paul packer wrote:
On 4 Jan 2007 03:07:54 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


paul packer wrote:
On 3 Jan 2007 21:30:42 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


"at least" you won't be following me over here.
just as well, for a country with such good looking women,
the guys look quite pedestrian.

And how do you explain that genetically, Art? I'm sure a geneticist
would tell you you must need glasses.

Whatever the genetic reason, he's telling the truth.

Perhaps the place should be studied. There may be something there that
scientists need to know about.

I'll bet scientists study there all the time, but keep the results
quiet...

Here I post a sensible scientific suggestion and you trivialise it
with innuendo. :-)

Innuendo?

How dare you!:-)