Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Arny Krueger wrote: "Phil Allison" wrote in message snip Arny has made the same ASININE error in FOUR posts. And as is your style, you've done nothing but posture about it, Phil. Why not show us a worked-out example? You're capable of it, I've seen you do it. A "class A amplifer" is one DESIGNED to work correctly in that mode. Whatever that means. I think it means "A "class A amplifer" is one DESIGNED to work correctly in that mode. " His wacky claim about peak device currents being higher in class A is FALSE. It's not wacky at all - I've seen it on the bench. It makes perfect sense. The maximum current through an output device at peak current is increased when you increase the quiescent current. Something about Kirchoff's law as applied to the junction of the top and bottom of the output stage, and the load. Obfuscation. Graham |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tubes vs solid state | Audio Opinions | |||
solid state vs tubes? | Tech | |||
KISS 191B by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Which 6550 for SVT reissue? | Vacuum Tubes |