Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eeyore" wrote in
message Arny Krueger wrote: As my distortion measuring gear progressed to residuals in below 0.01% there was always a mixed bag of measurable differences. But they were arguably quite small, given that its often darn hard to hear distortion below 0.1% or so. I had a 'revalation' that blew away that idea about 30 years ago. Do tell. I made my last try at making small amounts of nonlinear distortion audible about 5 years ago, and the 0.1% number was the fruit of that effort. My results aren't that dissimilar from those found in J. Robert Stuart (Meridian Audio), "Digital Audio for the Future", Audio, 3/98 pp 30-37. Stuart isn't exactly conservative on this topic. I know of nobody credible who has claimed lower thresholds for audibilty. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tubes vs solid state | Audio Opinions | |||
solid state vs tubes? | Tech | |||
KISS 191B by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Which 6550 for SVT reissue? | Vacuum Tubes |