Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Bret Ludwig wrote: High bias AB amps operate in class A through most of the power range they spend all their time in, giving the advantage of Calss A operation where it is needed, and rather than running out of power when this is exceeded they simply transition into Class B. This is true. The problem, however, is that although the distortion may be much lower in class AB than in class B, the distortion spectrum is often less pleasant, at least to my ear. I often find a given output stage sounds better biased into class B than up higher into class AB. **Bull****. Only poorly deisgned Class A/B amps sound significantly worse than an otherwise identical Class A amp. Pay careful attention to my words: "Otherwise identical". That's not what I said. That is not at ALL what I said. For low power studio-grade applications, though, there's no reason not to just go whole-hog and run everything Class A. Electricity is cheap. **There are plenty of reasons NOT to go pure Class A and very few to do so. Other than size and heat? **Cost, reliability and the fact that high bias Class A/B is lower in distortion. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tubes vs solid state | Audio Opinions | |||
solid state vs tubes? | Tech | |||
KISS 191B by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Which 6550 for SVT reissue? | Vacuum Tubes |