Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 May 2004 10:26:35 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: If I was trying for exceptional quality, I would have used one of the Tascam pro decks or one of the HX decks at my disposal. I'd tune bias and playback azimuth for the specific cassette which would be recorded and played on the same deck as quickly as I could rewind the tape.. I'd also post-process the recording in the digital domain in ways that would bring perceived sound quality pretty close to that of a DAT recorder. But I didn't do that because the claim that I was addressing hinged on the fact that cassette has poor performance. This seems weird to me. If you're trying to prove that a format is mediocre by using a mediocre player and procedure, then what's the point? Why even bother? It's a self-fulfilling prophesy. All this proves is that a mediocre player will produce a mediocre product. Nothing new about that... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question on CD cassette adapter for car. Sony. Sound cuts out when weather is hot | Car Audio | |||
Cassette Adaptor-- Do they degrade with time? | General | |||
Favortie Nostalgic Audio Gear & Recordings | Audio Opinions | |||
My equipment review of the Bose 901 | Audio Opinions | |||
digitizing cassette recordings | General |