From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 2:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a tone)
would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is useless
in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these posts
were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for being an
asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group from which
you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?

No I was making fun of the fact that you were kicked off of RAHE and you still
lurk there. I would think even someone who isn't the sharpest knife in the
drawer would get that much.

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.

Yeah, but you say a lot of stupid things.



I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said that
sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."


I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to do
the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine justifies your
dissembling?

No. Why is this so hard to understand? Do you have trouble with comprehending
first , second and third persons?



So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change of
context?

No, given the fact that it was posted on RAHE. The HE stands for highend. But
after that post some people started talking about Sound effects and horror film
sound tracks. I clarified the context for their sake.

BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should know that
"highend" is actually two words.

"definately"



Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high end should
be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the best that is
reasonably possible.

I'm not suggesting that anyone should be satisfied with your system Arny. Why
burn this straw man?



But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine justifies your
dissembling?

I am sorry you find such a simple post so difficult to understand. but you are
not the sharpest knife in the drawer.



When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for your own
actions?



What do you know about taking responsibility?

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 2:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a tone)
would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is
useless in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these posts
were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for being an
asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group from which
you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?

No I was making fun of the fact that you were kicked off of RAHE and
you still lurk there. I would think even someone who isn't the
sharpest knife in the drawer would get that much.

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.

Yeah, but you say a lot of stupid things.



I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said that
sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."


I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to do
the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

No. Why is this so hard to understand? Do you have trouble with
comprehending first , second and third persons?



So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is
revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change of
context?

No, given the fact that it was posted on RAHE. The HE stands for
highend. But after that post some people started talking about Sound
effects and horror film sound tracks. I clarified the context for
their sake.

BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should know that
"highend" is actually two words.

"definately"



Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high
end should be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the
best that is reasonably possible.

I'm not suggesting that anyone should be satisfied with your system
Arny. Why burn this straw man?

Since I did not mention my system, this would be a straw man argument. It
would appear that s888wheel is too stupid to recognize his own straw man
arguments.

But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

I am sorry you find such a simple post so difficult to understand.

What difficutly?

but you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that don't claim to be the
smartest person in world (an absolutley insane claim, were anybody to make
it) justifies your straw man augment and dissembling?

When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for
your own actions?

What do you know about taking responsibility?

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that your negative beliefs about
me justify your dissembling and use of a straw man argument?

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 3:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 2:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a tone)
would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is
useless in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these posts
were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for being an
asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group from which
you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?

No I was making fun of the fact that you were kicked off of RAHE and
you still lurk there. I would think even someone who isn't the
sharpest knife in the drawer would get that much.

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.

Yeah, but you say a lot of stupid things.



I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said that
sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."


I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to do
the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

No. Why is this so hard to understand? Do you have trouble with
comprehending first , second and third persons?



So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is
revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change of
context?

No, given the fact that it was posted on RAHE. The HE stands for
highend. But after that post some people started talking about Sound
effects and horror film sound tracks. I clarified the context for
their sake.

BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should know that
"highend" is actually two words.

"definately"



Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high
end should be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the
best that is reasonably possible.

I'm not suggesting that anyone should be satisfied with your system
Arny. Why burn this straw man?

Since I did not mention my system, this would be a straw man argument. It
would appear that s888wheel is too stupid to recognize his own straw man
arguments.

Once again you are too stupid to know when someone is making fun of you.



But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

I am sorry you find such a simple post so difficult to understand.

What difficutly?

Asked and answered. You can't even figure that out?



but you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that don't claim to be the
smartest person in world (an absolutley insane claim, were anybody to make
it) justifies your straw man augment and dissembling?


You still seem to be having trouble understanding the simple content of my
posts. sad



When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for
your own actions?

What do you know about taking responsibility?

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that your negative beliefs about
me justify your dissembling and use of a straw man argument?


No, I'm saying that you are the poster child for refusing to take
responsibility for your own actions. That makes you unqualified to pass
judgement on others when it comes to the subject IMO. Sorry my comment went
over your head, again.

From: Lionel il
Date: 4/25/2004 4:35 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Arny Krueger - - lundi 26 Avril 2004
00:45 wrote:

Lionel wrote:
S888Wheel - - lundi 26
Avril 2004 00:07 wrote:

I don't know what you are speaking about you seem too much obsessed.
BTW your obsession for my father is really morbid.

It's something like Marc Phillips obsession with pedophilia.

Marc Phillips is surely an interesting subject for S888Wheel's class-envy
testing sessions.

You are really disgusting.

S888wheel's dissembling and use of obvious straw man aguements is very
disgusting.


My gosh, it is well past midnight on a Sunday and you are still steaming over
me. No, you're not obsessed. (For those to stupid to recognize it, that was
sarcasm.)

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 3:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 2:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a
tone) would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is
useless in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these
posts were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for
being an asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group
from which you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?

No I was making fun of the fact that you were kicked off of RAHE and
you still lurk there. I would think even someone who isn't the
sharpest knife in the drawer would get that much.

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.

Yeah, but you say a lot of stupid things.



I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said
that sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."


I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to
do the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

No. Why is this so hard to understand? Do you have trouble with
comprehending first , second and third persons?



So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is
revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change
of context?

No, given the fact that it was posted on RAHE. The HE stands for
highend. But after that post some people started talking about Sound
effects and horror film sound tracks. I clarified the context for
their sake.

BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should know that
"highend" is actually two words.

"definately"



Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high
end should be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the
best that is reasonably possible.

I'm not suggesting that anyone should be satisfied with your system
Arny. Why burn this straw man?

Since I did not mention my system, this would be a straw man
argument. It would appear that s888wheel is too stupid to recognize
his own straw man arguments.

Once again you are too stupid to know when someone is making fun of
you.



But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

I am sorry you find such a simple post so difficult to understand.

What difficutly?

Asked and answered. You can't even figure that out?



but you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that don't claim to be the
smartest person in world (an absolutley insane claim, were anybody
to make it) justifies your straw man augment and dissembling?


You still seem to be having trouble understanding the simple content
of my posts. sad



When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for
your own actions?

What do you know about taking responsibility?

So S888wheel, are you saying that the fact that your negative
beliefs about me justify your dissembling and use of a straw man
argument?

No, I'm saying that you are the poster child for refusing to take
responsibility for your own actions.

Eepetitive response noted. S888wheel is clearing turning in circles.

So then S888wheel you are claiming that your negative perceptions about me
justifiy your irrational behavior, right?

That makes you unqualified to
pass judgement on others when it comes to the subject IMO.

Nobody is ever qualitifed to pass judgement.

That would be very self-serving. Proof by personal authority.

Sorry my comment went over your head, again.

When cornered, S888wheel finds that logic fails him, and he resorts to
insults.