Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Schizoid Man" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" declared in I refute the idea of Global warming. There is no evidence from anybody credible. How about the report below, from the National Geographic: (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...reenlandicemel t.html#main). John, You call National Geographic 'credible'? I'm sure what McKelvy means is The Washington Times, Townhall.com, National Review Online, Wall Street Journal, Fox News, The O'Reilly Factor, nutritionist turned conservative commentator Michael Savage, and of course that postillion of higher social, political and economic learning - Rush Limbaugh. Schiz What I consider credible is the people who have the best information, not a bunch of leftists with flawed computer models that aren't any better than random number generators, telling us what the climate is going to be like in 50-100 years when we can't predict the weather 3 days from now all that well. The people who really know are meteorologists and they aren't supporting the "climate scientists." The bulk of scientific opinion is against the idea of man made global warming. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US Manufacturing Grows For 10th Straight Month | Audio Opinions | |||
Another thing for Mike McKelvy to RETRACT (remember TopGun?) | Audio Opinions | |||
Retraction | Audio Opinions | |||
For Mike McKelvy, Bush tougher on terrorism than Clinton | Audio Opinions | |||
Google Proof of Unprovoked Personal Attack from McKelvy | Audio Opinions |