Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Gary A. Edelstein wrote: On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:50:52 -0400, Norman wrote: Hi, I have 2 similar table model FM radios, with similar reception problems. I connected a homemade folded dipole (made of twin lead) to the 300 ohm antenna terminals of one and had good results. The other radio has only a short length of wire as the FM antenna. I tried to increase the length somewhat but there was no appreciable change. I would like to connect a folded dipole to it but since it now has only the single wire antenna, no 300 ohm terminals, where would I connect the 2 dipole wires? The wire is probably 75 ohm. Actually, probably not; it's probably a high-impedance input. Those can work quite well with a "short" antenna, something a 75 ohm input cannot do. The difference lies in whether the input of the receiver wants signal power (matched impedance), or just signal voltage (high impedance). Oddly enough, if the input impedance is "infinite", the signal voltage (not power) picked up by the antenna is independent of its length. Isaac |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suggestions Indoor Amplified AM/FM Antenna | Audio Opinions | |||
window antenna problem | Car Audio | |||
1993 Rx-7 Antenna Question | Car Audio | |||
Radio reception worse than factory radio, antenna adapter? | Car Audio | |||
FM radio antenna height for car... ? | Pro Audio |