Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Fraser wrote:
Yes, although there are transformerless mic pres which are far quieter than Rupert Neve's typical designs. Scott Fraser Yes and no. Many current transformerless designs will achieve a better noise figure then Neve designs of 30 years ago *under the conditions of measurement* which usually means maximum gain. I'll even ignore the fact that most Neve mic pres had 10dB more maximum gain than most current designs and a few dBs more headroom. The point I want to make is that the measurement conditions bear little relation to the operating conditions the pre will normally be used under. At more normal gain settings the better gain structure and lower output noise of a Neve mean the achieved S/N of the Neve is better. Lastly I would disagree that transformerlees mic pres are *far* quieter than Rupert's typical designs. Rupert's designs achieved typical noise figures of 4dB at maximum gain. I doubt the best of today's designs achieve better than 1dB noise figure so at best they can be 3dB quieter. IAn |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes and no. Many current transformerless designs will achieve a better noise
figure then Neve designs of 30 years ago *under the conditions of measurement* which usually means maximum gain. That would be the conditions I'm referencing. RCA 77DXs on strings, Neve 31105s at 65 to 70 db gain. Basically too noisy to use as recorded. I'll even ignore the fact that most Neve mic pres had 10dB more maximum gain than most current designs and a few dBs more headroom. The point I want to make is that the measurement conditions bear little relation to the operating conditions the pre will normally be used under. At more normal gain settings the better gain structure and lower output noise of a Neve mean the achieved S/N of the Neve is better. Since we're talking ribbon mic application here, I think maximum gain must be assumed. Lastly I would disagree that transformerlees mic pres are *far* quieter than Rupert's typical designs. I didn't generalize about all transformerless designs, just that there are those which are quieter. Rupert's designs achieved typical noise figures of 4dB at maximum gain. I doubt the best of today's designs achieve better than 1dB noise figure so at best they can be 3dB quieter. 3 db is what I feel is fairly substantial, & pretty well matches my anecdotal experiences using ribbons with Neve 31105s & 1081s, as well as Neve-designed Focusrites, compared to Millennia & GML transformerless designs. Scott Fraser |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Scott R. Garrigus' DigiFreq Music Technology Newsletter - Issue 22 | General | |||
Scott 222C Amp-Power Transformer/Schematic Questions Please! | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Royer R-121 Questions Answered | Pro Audio | |||
Seven Questions + | Audio Opinions | |||
Scott Dorsey Sebatron Review | Pro Audio |