Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just found this sitting in my Drafts folder. Here goes anyway.
Ruud Broens wrote: Elsewhere in this thread, you recommend coax for longer (30 ft.) stretches, that is inconsistent with A and B, Arny :-) Optical's a problem for longer runs because of the optical loss caused by the cheap fibre not being optically 100% transparent. Not to do with signal 'degradation', just attenuation. With respect to welldefined edges, optical is clearly superior - even the plastic 850 nm home variety - to coax. I don't think so. The edges are 'rounded off' by the opto coupler response bandwidth. The early Toslink devices had only around 6 MHz to begin with IIRC which made them only just suitable. They seem to have improved recently though. Graham |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |