Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I was just locally offered an MCI 1" 8 track in "working condition". (No mention of the exact model #). The guy asked what I would offer him. I wrote back that "it all depends on the condition of the heads and motors and if the machine was high usage or not". Truthfully I know next to nothing about current prices for this type of recorder. Can someone please tell me how I should approach the seller, what to ask (and find out) and also what amount of $ to offer. Btw, my only experience is with semi-pro open reel analog decks such as that from TEAC and TASCAM so I'll need some guidance with regards to this MCI. Sincere thanks for your reply, Dan |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DL wrote:
I was just locally offered an MCI 1" 8 track in "working condition". (No mention of the exact model #). The guy asked what I would offer him. I wrote back that "it all depends on the condition of the heads and motors and if the machine was high usage or not". Truthfully I know next to nothing about current prices for this type of recorder. Can someone please tell me how I should approach the seller, what to ask (and find out) and also what amount of $ to offer. Btw, my only experience is with semi-pro open reel analog decks such as that from TEAC and TASCAM so I'll need some guidance with regards to this MCI. Get a head report from JRF. Offer whatever John tells you it's worth. For most of these machines, the heads are worth more than the rest of the machine. You're buying a headstack and getting a tape deck for free along with it. Alternatively you can just lowball it and see what happens. If he does not know enough about the machine to even tell you what model it is, he doesn't know what it's worth either. You can just offer $200 sight unseen and see what happens. If it's a JH-110, which statistically speaking it probably is, there isn't much to worry about other than the heads. Everything else can be fixed. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just found out that the person owns a popular pro studio here in town
but before going in to check the machine out, I'd like to know what I should be looking at (other than tape path condition) and what I'm offering. Thanks again guys. Dan |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks VERY much Scott! Yeah, I'll use some of what you advise re heads
etc .. It's near by so I'll see if I can make my way there to talk to the guy in person. Again, thank you very much for your reply! |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DL wrote: Just found out that the person owns a popular pro studio here in town but before going in to check the machine out, I'd like to know what I should be looking at (other than tape path condition) and what I'm offering. Thanks again guys. Dan Another thought... In this day and age, a new 1" MRL tape will cost almost as much as the machine is worth. If this eminates from a pro studio, see if he/she will include a usable MRL. For what it's worth, a couple (OK, a few) years ago at a NARAS surround mix forum in NYC, all the golden ears on the deus hired to remix classic rock/pop etc. agreed that analog 1" eight track was their mixdown medium of choice. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() kellykevm wrote: Another thought... In this day and age, a new 1" MRL tape will cost almost as much as the machine is worth. If this eminates from a pro studio, see if he/she will include a usable MRL. Good point thank you! For what it's worth, a couple (OK, a few) years ago at a NARAS surround mix forum in NYC, all the golden ears on the deus hired to remix classic rock/pop etc. agreed that analog 1" eight track was their mixdown medium of choice. Yeah, when I heard a 1" 8 track I almost sh*t my pants! OMG! What a sound!! I love the sound of my 'fore mentioned semi-pro recorders but this W I D E format really does sound amazing! Too bad I can't get my hands on a Brennell mini 8 track. Those would really be cool to have too! ![]() |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DL wrote: Yeah, when I heard a 1" 8 track I almost sh*t my pants! OMG! What a sound!! I love the sound of my 'fore mentioned semi-pro recorders but this W I D E format really does sound amazing! Too bad I can't get my hands on a Brennell mini 8 track. Those would really be cool to have too! ![]() Why not just get a 2" 16 track? More common and twice as many tracks. Same sound. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr. Dolittle wrote: DL wrote: Yeah, when I heard a 1" 8 track I almost sh*t my pants! OMG! What a sound!! I love the sound of my 'fore mentioned semi-pro recorders but this W I D E format really does sound amazing! Too bad I can't get my hands on a Brennell mini 8 track. Those would really be cool to have too! ![]() Why not just get a 2" 16 track? More common and twice as many tracks. Same sound. I've never felt I needed more than 8 tracks and if I ever do (unlikely), I'll just bounce. Plus 1" tape is cheaper. ![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....or use it as a front end for a DAW. Have as many analog tracks as you
want, while using the tape over and over Rick "DL" wrote in message ups.com... Dr. Dolittle wrote: DL wrote: Yeah, when I heard a 1" 8 track I almost sh*t my pants! OMG! What a sound!! I love the sound of my 'fore mentioned semi-pro recorders but this W I D E format really does sound amazing! Too bad I can't get my hands on a Brennell mini 8 track. Those would really be cool to have too! ![]() Why not just get a 2" 16 track? More common and twice as many tracks. Same sound. I've never felt I needed more than 8 tracks and if I ever do (unlikely), I'll just bounce. Plus 1" tape is cheaper. ![]() |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Dolittle wrote:
DL wrote: Yeah, when I heard a 1" 8 track I almost sh*t my pants! OMG! What a sound!! I love the sound of my 'fore mentioned semi-pro recorders but this W I D E format really does sound amazing! Too bad I can't get my hands on a Brennell mini 8 track. Those would really be cool to have too! ![]() Why not just get a 2" 16 track? More common and twice as many tracks. Same sound. Higher tape costs, heavier to carry around. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Dorsey wrote: Higher tape costs, heavier to carry around. Well sure, if he is going to use it as a portable system. And yes the tape costs more. Of course he could run it twice with 8 tracks at a shot. ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS- Studer 820- 1" 8 Track | Pro Audio | |||
Fast track pro - crackles when recording | Pro Audio | |||
"Drum Outtakes" | Pro Audio | |||
NTI CD-Maker Gold problem: please help | Pro Audio | |||
Is it possible to track to -1 when writing a CD? | Pro Audio |